Watch the video again Shane. I don't see how you can think the helmets where the first to hit. I've watched it more than a dozen times today...
Damn Shane. Calling a photoshop on a picture published by a newspaper? I hope you forgot [IMG]
As I see this: The helmets colliding isn't due to leading with the helmet. It's incidental contact after he'd hit the guy on his left shoulder...
Reed still doesn't have possession in this shot. [IMG] Both players were on the ground (feet) in these two shots. [IMG] [IMG]
I'm still waiting for anyone to point to where I was wrong.
Only because you are asking. Rule 7, Section 3, Article 6 covers a pass that is simultaneously caught by offense and defense. Possession goes to...
Impress me with the admission humor isn't your forte. Very good in run blocking. Both tackles aren't very good in pass pro—their right tackle...
Do you remember the call in the NFL a few years ago when the official cited "Giving him the business" as the penalty? I wonder if this ref...
There's one area that's real murky. IF his original contact point was where I saw it, at the top of the numbers and below the collar bone, how...
Per the rule book, Reed didn't have an INT in 2011. :D Couldn't resist...
Make that two. A statement like "looks like Big12 defenses" would be a compliment. Wallace not throwing any INT's is an improvement. A team...
The video of the play can be viewed by clicking here... Interfering with the catch? NO doubt. Targeting? There's no leading with the...
I knew he was doing it as a trial run kind of thing in Norman. I had not heard anything about how well it was received. Considering the plans to...
See my confusion?!?!?
This is likely due to a lack of quality effort in the past to remove fandom from opinion (as best as possible, mind you) and look at things from...
It's a subject of conversation, not something drastically important, but it IS something I consider worthy of note. Feel it's a bad thing?...
Grandiose? A flare—to emphasize a point. Absurdity. What do you hope to accomplish here?
I'll get to that question in just a bit. A little background on the context. The "official launch" for a web site that Barry Switzer is involved...
This mystery continues to the AP voters which is side of the story I was pointing to. Why? I can't say but I did say why it's a mystery to me....
This is what I mean with how we're looking at it this differently. You definition of serious interest is contingent on an committable offer....