Spending money does not equal safety. This war has no objective.
We could probably use even less.
Bases, sites, whatever the F you want to call them all. Waste.
They don't just fire nuclear. We have 400+ bases overseas. Waste.
Riiiiiiiggght. Does anyone still believe this type of talk? You can't even define "win" and neither can the govt.
Extremely laughable. A pathetic attempt of a "cut".
Us being there doesn't make anyone any safer. In fact it does the opposite over the long-term.
We have enough nuclear submarines strategically placed to take care of any real threat in hours.
I heard ramblings it will be outside of the mall. Flop.
Wrong again! Next.
You gave them money. If you don't like the way they spend money you cash your money out and put it somewhere else.
RP is a person. I subscribe to a philosophy. And SF I provide solutions. Usually you won't like it b/c it's too conservative for you ;)
For instance what? You talk about Bush spending, SF talks about Obama spending. Same - Same
The majority of people here follow the status quo whether you are Repub or Democrat. Same - Same. I talk about ideas that aren't popular....
That was actually fairly funny. Good work.
I get to pay double SS since I am self employed. The govt. gets to fack me twice.
Both of you are "after-the-fact" talkers. Try making a change while it still matters. Oh wait y'all vote for these morons.
Bid to end Afghan war funding hits GOP roadblock Well we could have saved $100B a year. The war in Afghanistan, now in its 10th year, is...
1T in 10 years is pathetic. By your account we will be what 24T in debt by 2021. Ugh.
You just don't want to answer the question because as most so called "conservatives" you talk the talk without walking the walk. Now it's your...
