Do you condemn sexual violence against women? Why do you refuse to condemn it when perpetrated by donald trump? Is it because you agree with him...
You're only demonstrating your dishonesty. And that you can't read. And, by the way, do you condemn sexual violence against women?
And, also, by the way, just as I said: whether it was semen on her dress or slobber, it was male material. The difference was immaterial to the...
And, just as I've said, you're an idiot. That doesn't say that a rape didn't occur. It only says that Ms. Carroll didn't prove it. You are a...
10 U.S. Code § 920 - Art. 120. Rape (a)Rape.—Any person subject to this chapter who commits a sexual act upon another person by— unlawful force...
You're an idiot and a liar. The jury didn't say there was no rape. The jury signed off that the plaintiff didn't PROVE rape with a preponderance...
So, if somebody raped somebody 3 decades ago they shouldn't be punished just as long as the rapist carries your political banner. You really...
No honest rational person on this planet believes that Joe Biden sexually abused his own daughter... or anybody else for that matter. You're as...
So cute. The proven racist insists on defending the proven self-confessed sexual abuser. I won't let you distract from the issue here: that...
Oh really? He BRAGGED on the Access Hollywood tape that he assaulted women without their permision, and then in this trial in deposition he...
So, let's get this straight.... it's OK with you that donald trump sexually assaults women as long as he can run out the clock. Gotcha.
That's quite a spineless whine from somebody who has already averred that Blacks are genetically inferior to Whites. And I won't let you get...
Your very transparent way of saying "I refuse to condemn my white supremacist hero".
Didn't lie about a thing. Why do you continue to defend a piece of shit except that you're of a similar nature?
And then the next question: did the wall close in on trump this time?
You're getting demolished here but you're not bright enough to see it. That part aside, why are you skirting the obvious: that trump is a piece...
And more logic, which will probably go wooosh right over your head: Failure to prove that something is more likely than not DOES NOT INDICATE a...
Now, I fully understand I'm presenting logic to a nitwit, but here goes: This is what your sentence ACTUALLY says: To prove an element by a...
You're losing the argument and are trying to deflect by calling me a liar. Now, how about you partially redeem yourself: admit that trump is a...
What part of the word PROVE don't you understand?