Yet you seem to be confused as to why.
Understanding seems hard for you. I've already linked why Texas didn't buy, did you miss that? Do you need me to link it again?
Still not seeing the word "banned".
Link? Not a fact. Did not buy =/= "banned".
Except not. It's been over a month since the elections, and there are still no calls by anyone in any of the 28 states who use Dominion voting...
Way to move those goal posts.
And that's true. Texas didn't choose to buy Dominion machines. So you can't remove what you don't have.
Scroll up. I've already linked to reports by Trump's own attorney general saying nothing wrong with the machines. I've also linked the conclusion...
Well there's irony for you. You parrot the concerns of a SOS who is by all accounts an absolute scumbag. He's under investigation for fraud, but...
I think this sums it up pretty good:
There's no evidence that Trump was right about that, like so many other things Trump says. JOINT STATEMENT FROM ELECTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE...
I guess you missed my previous answer. I don't mind reposting it for you again... Trump: The machines were "turned down by Texas and many others...
I didn't give a complicated answer. Texas wanted a feature Dominion did not and does not include on their machines. No question of standards, just...
I'm just waiting on you to realize that everything in my post was contained in your link as well.
Tell me in your own words what is substantially different between what the senator's office released and the link you provided. Everybody got...
Did you mean to reply to Frogleg instead? Otherwise, it looks like you're agreeing with me.
Umm, no it isn't... Tuberville’s office provided AL.com with the full statement made to Politico: ”I don’t know if you’ve ever talked to...
Each state gets to make that choice for themselves. Dominion machines are certified in 28 states.
You mean Texas does not -use- Dominion voting machines. Very different thing. Texas wanted a feature that Dominion didn't offer due to privacy...
[IMG]
