of course. and it speaks to how the system is broken. the media is broken. because the media has become so rabidly anti-trump, and trump knew it...
it would be rude to not pay them
so its real then and not russian disinfo?
jury found "no" on that count [IMG]
let me ask you a question. are you characterizing the actual text of the jury trial verdict as "splitting hairs?" the verdict, an actual scan...
ok well now that we put the incredible hilarity aside, maybe we wont have to over that again or say lol for no reason other than to deflect.. he...
she didnt what? claim he shoved his penis in her? nope i proved you wrong again i think you should give up maybe, or re-analyze whether...
nah they said no to that charge. see where the check is? its by the NO. [IMG]
bro you have to slow down with the shameful errors. you dont seem to know anything about anything. you claim there was jizz, there wasnt. then...
ms carrol claims they fucked, meaning he shoved his cock into her. but that isnt true, he just fingerblasted that filthy cunt? totally...
evidence for what? what are you asking me specifically? what are you talking about? i was talking about virus origin but i asked you where...
irrelevant? are we not talking about virus origin? can you be more clear what what you are talking about? do you understand what we are talking...
haha yeah lol hahah lol lol haha lol haha lol
the jury verdict is not splitting hairs. its the most important possible piece of information. trump was not found guilty, i dont think you...
exactly. and it worse than that. the standard was way less than proof, it was a preponderance of evidence and they clearly said "no" to that. i...
nah he declassified that stuff. dont worry about it
i see, where is the virus from?
correct he can do that
see the check there where it says "NO"? what do you think that means?
[IMG]
