Supreme Court nominee

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by SabanFan, May 27, 2009.

  1. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village


    See SabanFan, I told ya:grin:
     
  2. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    left of center replacing left of center.

    no need to jump off the ledge unless thomas or scalia croak in the next three years.
     
  3. XXL TideFan

    XXL TideFan Founding Member

    Just looking at her own words leads to the conclusion that she is a sexist and a racist.

    La Raza Speech
     
  4. XXL TideFan

    XXL TideFan Founding Member

    Unfortunately is was then and it is now a democracy. America isn't supposed to be a democracy................we are supposed to be a representative republic. Big difference....big, big difference.
     
  5. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    First, read it in context.
    So, . . . A Latina with "the richness of her experiences" might reach a better conclusion that a white male who has not had "the richness experience".

    Her point was an unexceptionable description of the fact that no matter how judges try to be impartial, their decisions are shaped in part by their personal backgrounds and values, especially when the law is unclear. As she detailed, for example, some studies suggest that female judges tend to have different voting patterns than males on issues including sex discrimination.
     
  6. XXL TideFan

    XXL TideFan Founding Member

    The law is the law. Ethnic and gender experiences be damned.
     
  7. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Her point might have been a tad bit more digestible if she hadn't used the word "better". I'm not convinced that a different background is necessarily better. She hits the PC checklist in almost every way. I believe Miguel Estrada would have been a better choice but he's not a female.

    Her opinion in the firefighter case is a poor one IMO. This is a lifetime appointment and when folks on the way left like Schumer say outright that Republicans should only contest her "at their own peril" makes her appointment much less than it could be and she'll be confirmed easily.
     
  8. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    So you know what her thought process was? I assume you can back up this assertion?

    Sounds to me like she's saying that white men don't know sh!t from shinola.
     
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village


    Which was a shoe polish from back in the day.:thumb:
     
  10. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james


    agree on all the above. terrible choice on an arrogant, not very bright (allegedly), bigot.

    get ready for your illegal immigration national health care laws.
     

Share This Page