<--- Is not worried. How about finding something nice to talk about instead of trying to dig up garbage.
For those of you who think I'm Mr. Negative for being worried about Matt's INTs, Stewart Mandel, who's been ranking LSU #1 most of the season, has the same concern. He's objective, and he agrees with me. Check out the caption next to LSU in this week's power rankings. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/stewart_mandel/11/13/power.rankings12/index.html
That's because it's the only weakness he can find. Every QB can cost their team a game. Well except maybe superman Tebow. Flynn only had one INT against Kentucky. One interception in a game isn't going to kill us with our defense. We didn't lose that game because of Flynn. What he can't have is another Alabama game, and I don't think that he will.
He also only had one against Auburn, on the hooker and ladder to Lafell/Auburn DB. If I remember correctly, he also only had one vs Florida as well, and that one was also deflected by a reciever.
How many INTs can you point to and definitively say that they are Flynn's fault? Not many if any (the key word being "definitively"). With our young rcvers, how do you know that the fault does not lie with them? Run the wrong route and the QB looks foolish. Were any of you in the huddle? Do any of you know the correct check off routes? No. INTs are not just Flynn's fault. The blame could be laid elsewhere. We just don't know.
With increasing experience, the young receivers should be running the routes better with better communication between the WR's and QB. All I am seeing is the passing game solidifying. Let's hope the O line continues to improve on pass protection.
next time just refer to the article instead. no need to worry about flynn. he's a heady quarterback, a game-manager and never makes critical mistakes. he controls the game and makes smart decisions. he's cerebral. all those interceptions and dropped picks are ryan perrilloux's fault anyhow.
If MF had been starting (or even playing much) any of those previous seasons, I would be concerned, but for a first year starter, I think he's having a good year. After all, we're ranked #1 (again) @ this point.
