Everytime I see the OP's handle, it looks like it says 'tigerclasswipe'. I think that's a better fit. And we'll just assume that the 'cl' stands for 'Clemson' since it's obvious which Tigers he doesn't pull for. The remainder speaks for itself.
I don't mind negative opinions at all, but this self proclaimed lunatic is only being provocative for the sake of getting attention. I really hope he becomes more astute as time goes on. If he had only said that LSU did not play well or that the coaches didn't coach well, I would have no problem with his opinion. But to try to justify himself by announcing that a dominating win on the road against the #15 ranked team in the country is no big deal is immature. :nope: !! Make some more insightful posts...and I'll give you some rep points back...really.
Red, this is a very good point and one we must recognize. If we talk (and we do) about how tough the SEC is, we MUST realize that means there are some really good teams out there. Some are better than others, but any SEC foe is worthy of our respect. Playing on the road - it ain't for sissies! Makes a tough job even tougher. Hats off to the Tigers for this quality win. :milesmic::geaux:
SOS still factors in, in terms of in the eyes of the voters. Beating Georgia at home is no easy task. Eh, we got it the first time doc. lol
This is about a bad a summation of the current status of LSU football as I have read in a while (thread starter, that is). Good grief. Then he says clock management wasn't a big deal.
That's not how it works, and if you think that, then you don't watch much football. Um, did you not watch LSU play their first few games? Exactly which game made you surmise that we should have beat them by 14?