Why so many 3 Stars?

We could have used the schlorships used on three stars for four and 5 star recruits

 

:hihi:

Well, let's see... we could run down the list of our starters that were 3 star recruits (which would be over half).

Or, we could point out all the first day draft picks that we rated under 4 stars (which is most of them).

Or, we could just say: trust our coaches, they didn't forget how to evaluate talent.

 

Why so many threads about 3 star recruits?

 

You Go CParso,, I know I will never ask that question again... got me in the doghouse fast ... whew...

 

yea i understand you're right and I do trust them but I didn't know there was another thread about this topoic b/c i just joined today

 

Are you kidding?

 

http://www.tigerforums.com/tiger-re...chlorships-these-bad-three-star-recruits.html

Perhaps you started another because you second guessed your first title. Good Choice.

 

as i always say:

"If the guys at Rivals were so good, they'd be recruiting coordinators somewhere."

trust the coaches.

look at the deep level of talent on the team. that's not all 5-stars.

I see a 2-star (Hester) starting over a 5-star (Keiland)

 

Not to mention a certain two star recruit whose photo was recently on the cover of Sports Illustrated. Hemi !