Why It Is Mathematically Impossible for Trump to win the White House

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tiger in NC, Mar 18, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    Just to point something out because it actually does prove the point....one jury said he was not guilty. Innocence is an entirely different thing.

    Another jury said he was guilty.
     
    LSUTiga likes this.
  2. COTiger

    COTiger 2010 Bowl Pick 'Em Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    16,784
    Likes Received:
    6,431
    Excellent post. And I'll tell you something you already know. You're pissing into a 60 mph head wind with someone who thinks denial is a river in Egypt.
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  3. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,743
    Likes Received:
    11,273
    Great point! And very correct.

    And Comey did much more than say "not guilty". Hell, people listening to his description of the findings thought he was about to drop the bomb. That's how damming her actions were.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2016
  4. sunnyjim

    sunnyjim Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    171
    See, that wasn't so hard. Why can't the angry guy just make his case like this instead of crying foul and saying go look it up.

    So, procedural errors were made that did not rise to the level of criminal activity. Got it.
     
  5. sunnyjim

    sunnyjim Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    171
    There is a huge difference. Petraeus knowingly distributed hard-copy classified information to a third party. Clinton never distributed any of these emails to anybody, nor were they ever compromised. They were only released as a result of this investigation. Any of them with classified information, retroactive or not, has never been released. Big difference.
     
  6. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,743
    Likes Received:
    11,273
    Uh, her account was hacked. An account she was warned about not using.THAT much, we DO know.

    Given that information, what would you think of this:
     
  7. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,701
    Likes Received:
    16,642
    No, it is written US Law, not a procedural error. You clearly don't "got it".
     
  8. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,701
    Likes Received:
    16,642
    They found MARKED documents. Marked. Comey confirmed this. We have linked his statement. it is 1000% fact.

    That means the the "i didn't know" story is rubbish.

    "I never received or sent classified information" -
     
  9. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    47,369
    Likes Received:
    21,536
    no thats not what he said at all. this is exactly what I was referring about having a semi honest discussion. Either people are alabama level deluded or straight up dishonest.

    "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences."

    she didnt get indicted because of who she is. we knew this going in. i didnt think he would spell it out for us however.
     
    LSUpride123 likes this.
  10. sunnyjim

    sunnyjim Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    171
    Petraeus gave classified documents to a third party, Clinton did not. If you can see this, you are as foolish as you think everybody else is.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page