I can't debate an article, because the article can't respond. I'll debate anyone who will make his own points and interact. But posting an article and disappearing is BS that I won't endorse with a response. If someone here writes an article, then I presume that they can defend it.
Joe lays it all out against AGW A Discourse on GlobalWarming, I mean Climate Change, oops I mean Climate Disruption | Firsthand Weather Anyone who wants to disagree with this has to disagree with Joe, since I am not intelligent enough to discuss a scientific argument (right, red55?).
Really good stuff there double D. I'm sure we are soon to learn that he is a used car salesman, or only a blog dude, and basically not credible. Should be fun to watch.
Who knows? You just post articles and never have any thoughts of your own. I don't debate with articles. And . . . for the last time . . . stop starting new threads everytime you see a AGW article you like. There are several recent ones you could have added this to. I'm tired of merging them.
Really good stuff? You didn't read it did you? :lol: It's pseudo science. Go ahead, take any of his loony ideas and try to make a case. I can hardly wait.