Here is the deal Red...what was started by the Russian invasion of Afghanistan and our support of the mujahedeen and the suppression of Muslim culture by their own dictators created a stew of fanaticism through out the Muslim ME that has boiled over. Bush 1 and to an extent B Clinton worked with the various Arab states to keep it contained but the fuse was lit. 9/11 was the first bang and our reinvasion of Afghanistan should have stopped when we dethroned the Taliban & pretty much decapitated AQ. Yes OBL and others were alive but they were the hunted and their end was sure even had we left the accursed country as many wanted. (I will say that was my feeling as I have read too much about countries that failed in Afghanistan). Unfortunately for the country (both of them US & AFGH) the Ds decided it was a good war and pushed W away from contemplating that (sure neocons like Mcain had the same view). Remember 2008 Red? Obama made that part of his campaign. W believed his rhetoric about secular democracy being possible in the ME and probably to show up daddy launched Iraq 2. Poorly conceived and run it turned into a quagmire. (to be honest I supported the idea as the neocon line about Iraq being a potential secular state was very attractive, Also at first blush it seemed to be working when we were greeted as liberators. Likewise other ME countries ie Libya seemed to take notice and moderate.) The fools W chose to run Iraq fed the flames is so many ways. To his credit Bush shifted found a competent general in Petreaus and set the stage for a possible end game that President Obama finished. Unfortunately it was as much of a false vision as the invasion. As others have said the certification that Iraq could stand on its own was a fiction rubber stamped because the US wanted out. Now with all that said president Obama did inherit a mess. What he has done is make the mess worse by pulling US leadership out of the discussion. He lost our ME allies confidence when he let Mubarak fall under the bus. He let the French take leadership in Libya (the French? when could they run an operation). He has backed off on his threats in Syria tried to reverse 60 years of policy in Israel. Imagine the Saudi of all nations working with Israel against Hamas. His poor handling of Iran allows them to get closer to being a nuclear power adding to the fears of all Sunni powers in the ME and Israel...making it less stable. Basically he has taken W's mistakes too much to heart and by trying to avoid over reaching has surrendered initiative thereby losing the trust of those who have been supporters. If no one trusts him they don't trust the US. It is leaving a huge vacuum and chaos is following. More than that his enemies DON"T FEAR him. The pin pricks of drones are nothing and your claim ISIS is isolated and weak is shown to be false daily. Putin from his weak assed position is closer to getting what he wants than we are to stopping him. He may go to war over Ukraine. If that happens we are in a massive lurch. If we fight it will be ugly,,,if we don't the countries bordering Russia could go back out of fear and belief we will never support them. All of the articles I cited point this out in one form or the other. Together the present overwhelming evidence that the President is out of his league and floundering, foundering through this critical juncture. I have said this is a very difficult time and there are no easy choices. However that as with the mistakes of his predecessors is no excuse for the level of incompetence he has shown. Our position in the ME and with our allies and enemies worse off than in 2008 by every measure. More than that our future is a greater risk because of his actions.
Of course you could take this evaluation from the left. http://www.salon.com/2014/08/09/is_obama_haunted_by_bushs_ghost_–_or_possessed_by_him/ Basically it says he has carried out the worst of W's policies. I guess Barry just can't win for losing.
Fanaticism is part and parcel of the middle east and has been for a very long time. It didn't start in 1979. Certainly not in 2009. Yep. They thought us invincible after The Kuwait War and Bush showed them all of our weaknesses that we thought we had left behind in Vietnam. A guerrilla insurgency and civil war is no place for the United States military. We need to stick to our kind of fights whenever possible, like in 1991. You complain whenever I mention that. Not Egypt, the biggest Arab country. Mubarak had to go and everybody knew it. We thought he might just die soon, he was old. But when the Egyptian people rose up against him, just like the United States rose up against King George, . . . we did the right thing and supported the people of Egypt, not an unpopular dictator, despite his pro-American stance. We learned in Iran in 1979 what a mistake it was to support the Shah against the will of the people. It would have been a first-magnitude blunder to repeat that mistake. Egypt erred in selecting the muslim Brotherhood as you pointed out loudly. I said just wait because the real power is the Egyptian Army. Lo and Behold the people soon grew angry at the Brotherhood and the Army stepped in and restored control. Egypt remains pro-American. As far as our ultra-conservative allies, who happen to be absolute dictators, in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and all of the Gulf States . . . well, they need a reminding from time to time that they are on the wrong side of history. And also who the Superpower is. They got the message. Now they are reining in some of the more radical elements in their own countries. Dood, he demanded that the French and the British and the Italians take charge, just like Clinton did in Bosnia. It was European turf. They all have trade with Libya and were demanding action from us to protect it. We had no trade with Libya and didn't really care if the revolution disrupted oil supplies. Obama forced the Euros to step up to the plate. As usual they needed our help (just like in Bosnia) but they stepped up and risked some of their own lives and treasure on the venture. We need to do more of that, especially regarding Ukraine, which is more important to Europe than to us. Especially Germany and Britain. Wise up! You can't be serious! He eliminated all of Syrias chemical weapons without firing a shot, spending a dollar, or losing a life. All with a threat that they obviously took seriously. Explain. You got a problem with that? You need to read the news more. Sanctions have worked. Iran is engaging with us to back off their weapons program. International inspections are happening. They have not produced a nuclear weapon, they haven't even produced a reactor. The one Russian reactor they have uses Russian fuel and spent fuel returns to Russia. Yeah, that's why Assad surrendered his WMDs. That's why Somali pirates no longer take American ships. That's why AQ in Yemen has been decimated and clamors for the drone strikes to stop. Get real. Winston, you have lost your freakin' mind. Hundreds of top al Qaeda and Taliban leaders are dead at the cost of zero lives. They have been hit hard in five countries. Al Qaeda has accomplished next to nothing in the last five years. I never said they were isolated and weak, I said that they have logistical weaknesses and will not able to sustain this offensive indefinitely. Watch and learn. Back to what, the Soviet Union? You are dreaming in your partisan attempts to blame all the worlds trouble on Obama. Has Putin invaded Ukraine? No. Has he taken the sanctions seriously? Yes. Are more nations considering NATO membership? Yes, Sweden and Finland. Are any trying to get out? Not nobody. Putin was going to push the envelope no matter who was in office. It's not like he sat round happy before. He took Abkhazia and South Ossetia from Georgia and crushed the Chechans when Dubya was in office. Now he has overreached. The top Russians that were running the Ukrainian uprising are leaving Ukraine to Ukrainians. Those guys are calling for a cease fire because the Ukrainian army is taking back its land. Putin failed to get the Ulrainian election overturned and his puppet reinstated. His minions shot down an airliner. The short-term tactical successes he achieved in Crimea are virtually irrelevant in light of short- and long-term strategic blunders that have not only undone much of what Putin hoped to achieve with his Ukrainian gambit, but have actually significantly eroded his political support and harmed Russia's position. And they were deeply flawed, as I have indicated. Pure political anti-Obama rhetoric. You ignore whatever is convenient and make wild claims without substance. Nice try. Isn't this more fun than "arguing" with an article?
The left dislikes his efforts as well as the right. They seem to be calling W's clone. I would call that losing.
Some of the left. Some of the radical left has always had a problem with Obama because he's a progressive, hecaters to the middle and indulges the right. They can't stand it. The right wingers have a far worse problem with the Tea Party radicals.
Something from an Arab on the threat of ISIS. You gotta quick looking to the past (AQ) and look to the future threat. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...vene_because_isis_s_goals_are_absolutely.html
Again from Slate (not exactly right wing) on what is happening in Russia. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ports_proves_that_we_can_t_achieve_peace.html A key quote from the piece "In other words, a large country that contains internationally traded companies has just decided that it prefers a territorial war with one of its neighbors to full membership in the international economic system. A large country that contains plenty of people educated in global economics has also decided it can accept higher food prices the in name of national honor. It is not only possible to reject the “win-win” mantra of globalization in favor of different values and another sort of politics—it is happening right now."
My position has not changed. We need to bow the fuck out. Maliki made this mess despite being handed a country with trillions of US dollars backing reconstruction. His bigoted ways has cost him dearly and he should pay. At the very least if the US steps in to assist, we should insist that Maliki step down. He has no credibility as a leader.