I generally get into a fury at Danielson during a game. But after a few days I soften and just accept he is trying to fill air time spontaneously. Not sure that any college announcer would satisfy me during a stressful Tiger game. I do enjoy Romo on NFL games.
there used to be 2 guys on espn that did a great job. One retired and not sure but I think one of them last name was franklin. I enjoyed when they did lsu games.
Up until yesterday, I hadn't watched any Nantz/Romo games this year. I had read several articles that were critical of his performances. I watched the Dallas game yesterday and I didn't have a problem with his analysis.
Nantz makes my stomach sick and my head hurt,, even Golf Digest makes fun of the Masters syrup he serves up.
I just get the a feeling that Danielson does not like LSU for some reason. It slips out the way he talks about LSU and the way he talks about whatever the opponent is that day. It comes out in his tones, especially when the other team does something well. It's very noticeable when LSU does something well like scores a TD, he very rarely has a positive tone when we do. Its always like, "Well Georgia will need to answer now" And when its BAMA, they don't even try to hide it. The entire coverage reverts to a hype video for Bama.