I am with you on this. It doesn't add up. Saddam is killing thousands upon thousands one decade and disarming the next decade.... Right:insane: The WMD's were moved, simple as that....
It is b/c they are not in Iraqu, but they were. What is sad that the people under Bush or even Bush could not notice that he moved them all out.. Either way, Saddam is a nutt case who is better off dead...
Prove it. We have the evidence of 10 years of UNSCOM inspectors on the ground merrily destroying tons and tons of nerve gas. They found it all, destroyed it all, and they told us this before the war. And they were right. Iraq moved nothing because there was nothing to move.
Prove that he didnt.... Thats such a silly game.... Seriously man, a man like Saddam doesn’t just turn cold turkey and become a nice guy after murdering thousands with chemical weapons….. I can’t prove he moved them any more than you can prove that he didn’t. See below: http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/03/no_wmds_really.html Articles like this and many more state that you are full if it Broskie!!! J 'And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them.' President Clinton, December 16, 1998 'We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.' Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002 'ISG technical experts fully evaluated less than one quarter of one percent of the over 10,000 weapons caches throughout Iraq, and visited fewer than ten ammunition depots identified prior to OIF as suspect CW sites.' Spare us all dood, really. You cannot sit there and tell me those inspectors used every resource possible and search 100% of Iraq, it’s impossible….
You made the positive statement. You have to prove it. That is how debate works. After 8 years of a massive military presense we have uncovered 0 evidence of any WMD. In the months leading up to the war there was no intelligence that suggested any weapons were moved. No nation was going to risk pissing off W because he was not scared to go in and lay waste to your country. There is no chance any WMD were moved. It didn't happen.
Did you even read the article? If not, do some research, there are more like it.. But to my point, you can’t PROVE anything. What you’re believing are reports based off evidence on “particular areas”. What you, Red and others are stating is a belief in a “hypothesis” that ( lol ) Iraq and zero WMD’s…. My hypothesis claims different.. You cannot prove yours over mine more than I can prove mine over yours… Conflicting reports. The report I linked stated 53 were found. 53 deemed to be worthy of a WMD. The report below stats around 500 were found. Here is yet another article I doubt any of you will read… http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,103631,00.html?ESRC=coastgnews.RSS Though you and others will claim zero.....
Just like Red and all Democrats, the New York Times demonstrated an amazing ability to backstroke. From 2004: Online NewsHour: The New York Times WMD Coverage -- May 26, 2004
