Vet referee comments on new rule changes

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by red55, Aug 9, 2011.

  1. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
  2. lsudolemite

    lsudolemite CodeJockey Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,588
    Likes Received:
    1,229
    This rule is going to be even more of a nightmare to enforce than the taunting rule. Already officials have basically been looking at the reaction instead of what they actually saw and called helmet-to-helmet. The new rule just enshrines that practice and it's going to be abused, a lot.

    I understand the need and desire to protect players, but I do not want to see Roger Goodell-style coddling brought to college football.
     
  3. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,743
    Likes Received:
    11,273
    Good rule.




    They'll easily find a way around this one. Old farts don't know half the technology out there today.
     
  4. KingEmeritus

    KingEmeritus ofthePoint

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    WTF!!!
     
  5. Thorny

    Thorny Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    37
    I think those are all pretty good rules. The helmet one is the toughest, but it at least makes it easier to call since all that really matters is how the offensive players helmet moves violently. The old rule also had the ref have to decide if the defensive player hit with his own helmet.

    It's always an adventure when Penn Wagers is refing a game.

    GEAUX TIGERS
     
  6. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,757
    Likes Received:
    17,053
    We talked about this in another thread, but I'll be interested to see how they handle the taunting by unnecessarily diving into the end zone. If a defender is close, the ball carrier will argue that he had to dive to score. It could easily become a judgement call situation.

    Good rule, if they properly enforce it. I remember JJ getting hammered at 'Bama two years ago with a blatant spear to the chest. No call.

    I didn't realize plays already were blown dead for this. Usually when the helmet comes off, its from the force of a hit that takes him down anyway. But from the ref's example, I can see where the old rule (stopping the clock), could be abused.

    How will this affect The Hat when he chooses to eat some grass? Oh wait, I'm confusing this with the 5-second rule. :D
     
  7. Speedy G

    Speedy G Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    19
    I wish they had left out the "neck area." Isn't that basically where shoulder pads are. Drill a guy around the collar bone and it's a penalty?

    So, the offense can't run a play if there are 12 defenders on the field? Sounds like a good way to get out of a bad personnel situation or shut down a no huddle/quick snap offense, w/o burning a timeout. Just run a 12th guy out there, so they can't snap the ball. Five yards? No big deal, especially if you'd be short a cover guy or your defense is coming unhinged.
     
  8. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,757
    Likes Received:
    17,053
    Good call....if coaches pick up on that one, it will be a one (season) and done rule.
     
  9. GregLSU

    GregLSU LSUFANS.com

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2007
    Messages:
    8,293
    Likes Received:
    3,798
    Another loophole to stop the quick tempo offense of the Ducks lol.
     

Share This Page