ARMING some teachers, ARMED private adequately paid security guards from 7am to 5pm at every school, maned and electronic detection system at single point entry and extra tough security locks on all classroom doors. Aslo all teachers, principals and staff should drill for these eventualities. Lastly get these woke pussy teachers out of our schools. Once again if we can do the below we can certainly do the above plan.
Don't agree armed guards and teachers is the answer. A lot of these schools are huge. An armed guard or 2 is of little help, especially if they have no idea where the gunman is. So many class rooms where the gun man could be holed up. Also, all teachers are not going to be willing to carry firearms. Should schools then hire only teachers willing to pack and train? It would cost a lot too. The liability would be astronomical. Then, what's next. Churches and stores, too? $'s. A lot already are. How much good did an armed guard do in Buffalo? You think the only coward cops were in Uvalde? Dream on. You could go on and on. Then what.. the Mom and Pops, who often are hanging by a thread already. Adding costs to them? Again, if you can't identify where the shooter is quickly, more people will die.
Sorry you are a fool. So it's OK for the elite who can afford armed security to protect themselves but school children are not worthy? Well let's just not have any armed security for Biden, house and Senate. Let's outlaw security for celebrities for banks, sporting events etc etc etc. Let's see how that will be recieved by your vile DEMOCRATS, the MSM, Hollywood, sports, banks and music stars. Are they somehow more worthy? You are a fool.
You’re a fucking idiot. That should be enough said but I’ll point out one other obvious fallacy in addition to those listed by @rockwallfan. The only one on your list who may be effectively protected by armed security is the president. Most you list and almost all of ant teachers would be as useless as tits on a boar in a shooting situation unless they took hours of continuous training. Very few people can switch to an active kill or be killed state of mind without being drilled and trained. Your “solution “ is nothing but the fantasy of a sick mind.
Except at the National NRA Convention. Go figure. The whole reason for the convention but guns aren't allowed. Like 100% of the attendees insist they make us safer. Help me understand this one. https://www.click2houston.com/news/...m-high-profile-speakers-to-security-measures/
Do we really need armed teachers? Or do we just need to get rid of those stupid 'gun free zones'? Even if not a single teacher at Robb ES were armed, would the possibility that some might be have given Uvalde shooter pause? As it was, he knew there were no guns to shoot back at him. I was looking back at the "Repeal 2A" thread yesterday. Someone had posted a video where Project Veritas had tracked down all of the media in a given town that were advocating gun bans and asked if they could put a 'gun free zone' sign in their front yards. No one approved. Who in their right mind would think advertising to the world that you're willfully unprotected is a good idea?
You are an idiot and if you were in a position to make laws and legislation you would be dangerous. Look you confused phony centrist ass the house and senate is surrounded by walls and massive electronic and manned security. Just ask the husband of the very dangerous to democracy Ashli Babbit, that dangerous woman almost ended this country till that brave black security guard killed that lethal unarmed white devil. Guns for thee but not for me ugh? Don't think so.
I don't think Gun Free Zone signs are wise either. It doesn't mean there were none somewhere on campus. Honestly, I have to lean to "probably not". But I've seen few to no suggestions that would've made the job safer, easier and quicker than having cameras throughout schools.
What cameras would do is tell us where the shooter is at any given time (assuming every inch of the property is covered). What they won't do is keep him out in the first place. Good guys with guns, or the threat of good guys with guns, will do that. But at least we're addressing the bad guy as the problem and not the gun. I'm willing to listen to the argument that 2A doesn't prevent government from making a given type of weapon illegal, but bans are useless if you can't keep the bad guys from getting the ones that are already out there.
