Or just maybe, USC being in a weak conference, a conference in which we have yet to lose a game to in 5 years... just really isn't as good as Herbys' and Holtzs' lips think they are. For years they've gotten by on a weak conference schedule and perfect bowl matchups (Illinois for instance)... and now their in unfamiliar territory playing with talent more level to the rest of the PAC10 and actually having to rely on scraping out wins. USC is not unbeatable, and put them in the SEC and their a 3 loss team every year minimum. I'm not saying UW is terrible... but their not that good. LSU just had a bad game to start the season, we're young and haven't gel'd yet so to speak. Our talent level is 10x what the PAC10 has to offer... what it all boils down to is USC is just not lights out better than everyone this season. Still hoping for a Trojan loss but i've seen them wish too many wins out of close games in the end.
Excellent drive between the 20's, but I'm afraid getting 3 rather than 7 there will come back to haunt the Huskies.
Nothing personal, but your idiotic opinions leave alot to be desired. If, in fact Washington is "not very good", then what's that say about LSU and USC? By listening to your dumbazz opinions, anyone would conclude that you really feel LSU and USC aren't too good either. Washington is giving USC ALL they can handle, and may actually beat them, and we know how we did against Washington. But you claim Washington isn't that good, as I'm watching them go up by 3 on USC. Looks like your invaild, dumbazz, idiotic points are not to be taken seriously. And about your definition of "southern folk", I was born and raised in Baton Rouge, you moron. Just shows you made another idiotic assumption.
Notice the cameras are just starting to shake. They did all game for LSU. UWmaverick, your fans need to get with the program, literally.
Re-read all I have said. Or maybe you're just too stupid or been up north too long. USC is NOT a great team this season, or most for that matter... and UW beating USC does not make them great and us even greater. It means USC sucks this season like most... and shouldn't be in the top 5. Their not loaded with talent this year, and have several ? in key positions. So yes they will struggle. Their just playing more evenly matched teams then they have in the past. I am not going to sit here and trade "who's cock is bigger" remarks with your yankee doodle dumbass any longer. And if you're ever in BR again let me know... I'll make the trip and we can get together for a beer, and then see if you wanna talk **** to my face.
Yes, LSU hasn't lost a game to the PAC-10, but Tennessee hast lost two years in a row to a very mediocre UCLA team. USC has blown out several SEC teams in recent years as well. So before you go calling the PAC-10 a weak conference, I'd look at the fact that if you look at the PACX vs SEC over the last few years, the PACX leads 10-8. Washington Leads 13-10, though USC's offense woke up. And Washington's defense holds in the redzone, Tied at 13-13 with under 5 minutes left.
I'll let every member of TF's read your post and maybe we can take a moron vote. I think you'll win, if you're not a moron, I haven't a clue who is. And I'll concede you're also the biggest co*k posting here too. Oh,,,,I don't drink with azzoles so I don't think we'll be having a beer together, especially face to face (I'm sure you're as ugly as your are stupid). I'm done with you loser.
Yeah you're right... but those SEC teams have been who? UT and Arky? Not exactly stellar, although I really have no room to talk... we lost to Arky 2 years straight now... which sucks balls.
SEC 60-38-5 all time vs. Pac 10. I am impressed with the way the coaching staff has prepared his team for this game. Sark knows USC very well, and i think they have done a great job.