Still looks better than the way you backed into yours. A better in every regard you can imagine except you don't like the team. Adult conversation here. Go play in the street.
Not when you are ignoring losses for one. One of my issues is how one team can be a quality win, but another a bad loss, and then there's the such thing now as a quality loss? Wisky was getting no credit for beating Iowa--just a win. Iowa gets a real quality win by beating Ohio State. Ohio State gets credit for beating Wisky--another quality win--but Wisky beating the team that beat ... There's not a damn thing about what happened that makes perfect sense. Some of the reasoning makes no sense as well (and I'm dreading thinking about your reasoning.) Bayless is saying Bama doesn't belong but he's looking forward to seeing Mayfield plant the flag against Saban's defense in the championship game. Think about that scenario ... I've heard it stated that Ohio State beat an undefeated Wisconsin team while Alabama lost to a three loss Auburn team. That can't be played both ways. Root against Bama. I expect it from you. But don't go pulling this "makes perfect sense" when you know damn well it doesn't, hasn't, and likely never will.
I respectfully disagree. We WON our conference. Lost in double, nay TRIPLE OT. You got dominated and were trending down the entire month of November. Plus, 2007 or 2003 LSU would stomp a mudhole in this year's Alabama team.
I was talking about what Nootch said about the playoffs watering down the season. Oh and whatever system keeps the gumps out, I want that one.
You lost to an unranked Arkansas team, the same weekend (last of they year) as Bama. Unranked Arkansas team. 4-4 Arkansas team. Second loss, amigo. (eheheh.) Trending downward based on MSU after LSU. Pulling the overtime thing again. It's almost as if you don't watch football.
