Maybe you should leave the country and join Rosie O'Donnel and Alex Baldwin in their new country of O'Baldwinia. Want need the EC in O'Baldwinia or the Constitution
Nope. "A few generations ago, before the technology boom transformed San Francisco and sent housing costs soaring, the city was alive with children and families. Today it has the lowest percentage of children of any of the largest 100 cities in America, according to census data.... the share of children in San Francisco fell to 13 percent, low even compared with another expensive city, New York, with 21 percent. In Chicago, 23 percent of the population is under 18 years old, which is also the overall average across the United States.... when you walk through the growing number of neighborhoods where employees of Google, Twitter and so many other technology companies live or work, the sidewalks display a narrow band of humanity, as if life started at 22 and ended somewhere around 40. “Sometimes I’ll be walking through the city and I’ll see a child and think, ‘Hey, wait a second. What are you doing here?’” said Courtney Nam, who works downtown at a tech start-up. “You don’t really see that many kids.” There is one statistic that the city’s natives have heard too many times. San Francisco, population 865,000, has roughly the same number of dogs as children: 120,000. In many areas of the city, pet grooming shops seem more common than schools." https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/us/san-francisco-children.html?_r=0 http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/02/05/382664837/map-the-most-common-job-in-every-state There are truck drivers everywhere homeslice. Manly men do not reside in San Francisco. They do however, reside in SEC territory. Lives in San Francisco..... Lives in the South... The biggest reason NOT to live in San Francisco. I despise the Giants, always have.
