False. Andrea Bernstein, ProPublica: So, just after 3:00, the jury filed into the courtroom. The forewoman stood up. The judge asked if the jury had reached a verdict. She said they had. An envelope was passed over to the judge. And there had been a verdict sheet. So, even though there were only two counts, the jury had to answer 10 questions. And the first question was, did the jury find by the preponderance of the evidence that Trump had raped E. Jean Carroll? And the answer to that was no.
"Former US president Donald Trump sexually abused magazine writer E Jean Carroll and then defamed her by branding her a liar, a jury in a civil trial has decided, but the jurors found he did not rape her". Donald Trump found liable for sexually abusing writer E Jean Carroll in civil trial - ABC News
That's correct. They said she hadn't PROVEN the rape. That's not the same as "specifically saying he didn't rape her" as you claimed.
And let's get right down to the nitty gritty.... what sort of p.o.s.'s would still support a p.o.s. who sexually batters a stranger without her permission?