trump, the rapist

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Rex, Apr 23, 2023.

  1. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    That's exactly what I said, you hopeless twit.

    Now, we already know that you consider blacks and Latinos genetically inferior to whites. When will you admit that you still support that piece of shit because he's a white supremacist?
     
  2. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    What part of the word PROVE don't you understand?
     
  3. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    6,422
    you are deflecting. we both know i caught you lying yet again and you are trying to change the subject.
     
  4. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    6,422
    there is no part i do not understand. the jury, provably, via the document from the court, did not find the rape claim to have the preponderance of the evidence, meaning they did not find it more likely to be true that not.
     
  5. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    You're losing the argument and are trying to deflect by calling me a liar.

    Now, how about you partially redeem yourself: admit that trump is a piece of shit. Are you man enough?
     
  6. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    6,422
  7. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Now, I fully understand I'm presenting logic to a nitwit, but here goes:

    This is what your sentence ACTUALLY says:

    To prove an element by a preponderance of the evidence simply means to PROVE that something is more likely than not.

    But this is what you WANT it to say:

    To prove an element by a preponderance of the evidence simply means that something is more likely than not.

    Do you spot the difference? What part of "prove" don't you understand?
     
  8. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    And more logic, which will probably go wooosh right over your head:

    Failure to prove that something is more likely than not DOES NOT INDICATE a fucking thing about the likelihood of that something.
     
  9. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    6,422
    there is no part i do not understand. the jury, provably, via the document from the court, did not find the rape claim to have the preponderance of the evidence, meaning they did not find it more likely to be true that not.
     
  10. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    You're getting demolished here but you're not bright enough to see it.

    That part aside, why are you skirting the obvious: that trump is a piece of shit? Redeem yourself. Are you man enough to state the obvious?
     

Share This Page