Top ranked Oregon women's basketball team defeats Team USA

not true. if they were all conference high school players, they would win. unless they are total chumps i suspect the women never win.

what difference does it make? they are worse. better players are better, worse players are worse. the difference is the talent.

glad you like it, you should try male junior high.

you think wrong, its less. the mens game is played at a much higher level with more advanced competition. the male players have been playing against far better competition their whole lives. playing against better competition is vital for development. its why US mens soccer sucks. kids in europe play at a higher level from elementary school.

again, they play at a middle school level. they are small and slow. not sure why you wanna piss on the young fellas.

dont blame me i support the women continuing their poor play without interference.

 

https://www.dailyemerald.com/sports...cle_fa75bc49-e589-5a30-97e1-78744af83f52.html

this article never mentions the men being all conference. not even sure high schools have conferences.

so its not just that i think the coach is lying, its that i have no evidence he said what you claimed.

i have read a billion articles about these practice fellas. they are at every div 1 school. they are told not to dunk. they dont do ally-oops or athletic plays. they run around pretending to be girl opponents. they are poor high school players they find at the rec center.

this is not true. repeat. not true.

not sarcasm, totally sincere. i support their right to play at a level so low they would get beat by trannies. men are so much better that even trannies ruin the world champion women.

 

i didnt say i dont watch womens basketball. i said the level of play is very low level, on par with middle school males.

i have read the article about male practice players many many times. i am interested in collective delusions. like religion. or anything where people say things that are not true. like frequently folks say the US women could beat the US men at soccer. i hear this all the time, and have for years, because the men are shit compared to men globally. but not only is this not true, it is earth shatteringly not true.

women are awful at sports. just awful. a tiny mens college track team is better than the best womens track team of all time. serena williams would be beaten by all the men that play for LSU, and lsu tennis isnt even very good.

there has only been a handful of women in history that can dunk, and just a few in-game in the history of the league. every player on the LSU team can dunk better than the greatest woman dunker of all time, britney griner ( a very masculine lesbian by the way).



junior high men dunk with ferocity. better than any WNBA in history by a mile.

so again, this is the kind of delusion i find interesting. the men who practice vs oregon women are not all state or all conference. if they were, they would destroy them women EVERY SINGLE TIME.

they are gym rats from the rec center. they played poorly in high school and at best are division 3 level mens players. and division 3 is just older high school level.

 

i should note, you frequently hear the point:

the women are not as athletic, but they are better at strategy and fundamentals.

this is also very very untrue. they are worse at all aspects of the game. they are also worse than men at strategy games, like chess for example, where the greatest women in history are not close to the top. not close. geneerally at any given time there are zero or 1 woman in the top 100

 

i know, weird