Time for positive

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by LSUpride123, Sep 6, 2009.

  1. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    Yea, I am disappointed too, however, we did improve int he 2nd half which shows that they did in fact try to improve...

    Also, our D was on the field A lot. more than they should have been.

    I know they held a lot back and we will see more.

    We will improve on D.

    We will improve on O.

    And we will beat Vandy next week..
     
  2. Fishhead

    Fishhead Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,887
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    1)That is not a positive.
    2)You don't know that...why would they unless it was a blowout in our favor early?
    3)Based on what evidence?
    4)Only if the D improves.
    5)Remains to be seen.
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644

    It's only positive to those who choose to see it

    Well, from what hes said about players and plays, i am willing to bet we haven't seen everything of the LSU O in ONE GAME...

    We improved in the second half, so uh, yea..

    And the O will improve

    Ur just being negative

    LOL from 1st half to second LSU was night and day. Not saying Day was OMG awesome, but it was much better..

    Also, give some credit to the players who will watch film and see the mistakes and missed opportunities.
     
  4. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    18,000
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    the positive i would like to point out...

    we arent ou.
     
  5. Fishhead

    Fishhead Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,887
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    I totally agree that the D was on the field too long...but they couldn't tackle from the start. I understand what you're saying, that the fact that they were on the field so long is why they sucked...but 1, I disagree, and 2, them being on the field so long is NOT a positive for LSU. We gave up nearly 500 yds of offense to a team that is 0fer it's last 15. The one positive I saw on defense was PP...and maybe Drake.
    -
    I assume you mean from what Miles said about the O. He also said this is the best OLine he's ever had. If it is, then UW has the best DL I'VE ever seen! JJ had zero time to throw...and Scott up the middle sucked. In fact, our superior running game as a whole sucked. So no time for the QB and sorry running game = a sorry O. Sorry, but I don't believe you hide parts of the playbook in a game that you fall behind immediately. You hide playbook when your team jumps out and it's obvious the other team can't hang. Crowton hid playbook against MSU 2 years ago...because we could. We won that game 45-0. This game was in serious doubt in the 4th qtr.
    -
    On offense, we scored 10 in the first half, and 14 in the second. So yes, we did improve...but not much. You know good and well we should've run away with this in the second half.

    On defense, we gave up 13 in the first half, and 10 in the second. Again, not much improvement...and no...you cannot discount the last score.

    I will give credit to the players AND coaches when they earn it...don't tell me what you can do...SHOW me.
     

Share This Page