Ahh, changing your tune once again. I don't blame you. Fucking Fencepost. What is this supposed to mean? This is a political debate forum. Either argue your points or counter mine. Or drop it. But don't try to tell me "separate myself" from my position. How stupid is that?
Your interpretation of my statement is the wrong one. I have pointed out my general statements flaws in how it can be interpreted. You need to separate yourself from your original interpretation b/c its meaning was wrong. And again as you always do, instead of talking about it you resort to self proclaimed victory dances.
A cop out. You took your own meaning not once trying to clarify. This doesn't make you right. Not once in my original statement did I say "revenue". You brought that term into the discussion and as soon as I read that, I new your thought path was in a different place only looking to claim a victory over word usage.
OK, then start from the beginning. Make your point. Think about it and get it right, then say it carefully and add all the context you want. Then its my turn. Perhaps you will phrase it so eloquently that I will have no objection. You should know all of its pitfalls by now.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/jointcommitteereport.pdf Well, this attachment will show just how well you've been listening, Pride. it's all here in black and white....the President's plan to raise taxes, reform the tax code, lower corporate taxes, cutting entitlement spending, cut defense spending, enact an infrastructure bill to rebuild crumbling infrastructure. I went to Mitt Romney's web site but he has no plan listed. Even when he speaks he gives no specifics. In fact, he has stated he will not give specifics to his plan until he's elected. Real transparent, huh?
Pride, you are the one who is spewing bull shit and cannot form an intelligible argument for your side. Every time you are cornered, which isn't hard, you start swearing and cursing and accusing everyone else of being dumb asses. So just prove it. Prove that Red, Obama and I are total dumb asses by providing some evidence to support what you are saying.
You are giving us absolutely no reason NOT to take a victory dance when you fail to support your argument. You love to tell us, "Prove it," but when we do you never counter with anything of substance, it's always more vitriol, more "You're stupid!"
When i do ask you to prove something, I do not make you cite a fucking sources. Lets be clear about that. What I almost always do is ask for an example.
When have I been cornered exactly>? If I am unclear of a statement you make, I ask for clarification. I, you, and Red all make general statements all the time and can easily be miss interpreted. You tend to latch onto this and rush to victory arguing over the meaning of the statement rather than the content. That is not a debate. That is a school girl fight.
