I'm going with the box score on this one. Just like the scoreboard, there's no argument against those numbers.
Glass mobile homes... Denying the quaility of officiating is a factor in the outcomes of games is delusional. You frame it as the sole factor to discredit others observations.
No changing the mind of a gump. He still believes that INT by PP several years ago (the one that show his foot imprint inside the field of play but was called out of bounds) was still a good call. He claims to use data, facts, and evidence but yet ignores it when they become contrary to his agenda. See the evidence below.
And I'm about to say the same thing to him as I've said to you on numerous occasions... Go find where I've said and post a link. You won't, because you can't. There's data, evidence, and facts for ya.
Buddy we had a long discussion about this a while back. You never would give in and admit you were wrong. I know you never will it is in your nature. I get it, I also think it's laughable that you use "data and stats" but refuse to acknowledge evidence as strong as the above pic. Kind of funny actually.
Actually, I see the complete opposite. In fact, no better evidence than that found in this thread with @Rouxleaux pointing to a call as if it is the reason for the LSU loss in 2009. Taint? Lost me.