They really think we are that stupid

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by SabanFan, Feb 11, 2010.

Page 32 of 36
  1. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Yeah!

    Building 7 was not a target of terrorist attack, it was a collateral casualtiy from the collapse of the towers.

    THIS IS NOT A FACT AND HAS ALREADY BEEN SHOT DOWN.

    NOT TRUE.

    You seem ready to make a fact out of every allegation that you read and you don't even bother to check them out before making them. You leave it to me to find the evidence to demolish them and I tire of it.

    Either come up with something new and back it up with evidence (not some truthers allegation) or I must ignore your allegations.
     
    red55, Feb 20, 2010
    #311
  2. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    that is what i mean. why so eager to believe anything, provided that it is ludicrous. apparently anything but the reality is easy to believe, even thought the reality is quite straightforward, and involves islamic terrorists doing exactly what you would expect them to do, suicide murdering of innocent people. they dont really do anything else.
     
    martin, Feb 20, 2010
    #312
  3. flabengal

    flabengal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,320
    Likes Received:
    84
    Understand if a little fatigue sets in.....but where would you expect an allegation to come from if not from someone who doubts the official story.

    I included two links I can think of off the top of my head that were from sources that support the official story regarding the tail section in the pentagon crash. I included a story from the Israeli Counterterrorism Unit and you seemed to claim this source wasn't credible as well.

    I don't know what more I can do from my living room.

    You seem to suggest that I have to get the defense witnesses to change their story. Each side is supposed to be able to call their own witnesses for obvious reasons.

    Lastly, I don't know how to get around the problem of sourcing. This has come up repeatedly. It seems unfair of you to expect the government to provide damning evidence countrary to their report, especially if a cover up is involved. I mean, how the hell is that supposed to work in the real world?

    If you were the prosecuting attorney in the OJ trial I guess you would just ask OJ if he did it and leave it at that.

    But, again, enjoyed the debate. If I come up with any way to get around this sourcing problem then will be happy to bring it to the attention of FSA.
     
    flabengal, Feb 20, 2010
    #313
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    9/11 was one of the most public events in history and documented from multiple parallel sources--government at every level, foreign, commercial, and private. I don't even accept the notion that there is an "Official Story".

    There is an obvious and huge story with a preponderance of evidence that it was a surprise terrorist attack by AL Qaeda. The existence of dissent does not make this preponderance of evidence go away. Failure to explain this is what makes all of the conspiracy theories collapse.
     
    red55, Feb 20, 2010
    #314
  5. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    i think it is extreme narcissism that drives the truthers. they desperately want to see and understand things the rest of us cant. to do that they have to ignore reality, but i guess that isnt much of a challenge for people.
     
    martin, Feb 21, 2010
    #315
  6. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    18,000
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    i still dislike the term "truthers". i mean it is anything but the truth that they believe in. now if you were to say "anti-truther", that i would buy.
     
    OkieTigerTK, Feb 21, 2010
    #316
  7. KyleK

    KyleK Who, me? Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    9,109
    Likes Received:
    3,366
    how much for your space? i need some.
     
    KyleK, Feb 21, 2010
    #317
    1 person likes this.
  8. gumborue

    gumborue Throwin Ched

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,839
    Likes Received:
    577
    they used dry ice.
     
    gumborue, Feb 22, 2010
    #318
  9. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    the offical truther story is they used thermite, which apparently cannot be traced because it burns up. the triggering devices would have been vaporized i am sure, leaving no evidence. the secret gang who did this, they had everything taken care of, no loose ends, no evidence.
     
    martin, Feb 22, 2010
    #319
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    The thermite angle has been thoroughly debunked.

    http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
     
    red55, Feb 22, 2010
    #320
Page 32 of 36

Share This Page