They really think we are that stupid

when they went to the old airplane parts store to get junk to plant at the site, they didnt have space in their pickup truck for tail parts. so the conspirators just assumed that people would think like sabanfan and be tricked by the parts that they did manage to get and plant at the site while nobody was looking.

 

What you're asking is for someone to help you defend your argument. There's no defending stupid.

 

I disagree.

 

The point was only regarding martin's assertion that I was lying about the pilot's comments regarding the lack of tail section. This was a report favoring the official story and still indicated no tail section had been found.

Therefore, an independent source has backed up the pilot's story. Which should be a good indication that I am not lying about what the pilot said to me.

Which means that the pilot's assertion to me that the tail section is always found in the wreckage could be:

a) incorect- maybe for reasons mentioned above.

or

b) correct- and the object was not a 767.

The topic is open to inquiry from reasonable people. It's a close call so an honest person could come to the wrong conclusion. In that case he would mistaken, not lying. A distintction martin is incapable of making.

There is a difference between the two......and a person incapable of making such a simple distinction is not someone I would want making decisions in any case important to me.

 

Fixed it.

 

what is wrong with you? i cant believe i have to explain this. of course the tail section was found. the whole plane crashed! are you ok? is something wrong with you?

no it isnt.

i have heard that there are some truthers that believe some reptile race was behind 9/11 (seriously). think of how crazy those people appear to you and you will understand roughly how crazy you appear to the sane folks.

you are lying, even if only to yourself and not us.

i feel like something must have happened to truthers that broke their minds or something. they are like malfunctioning people.

 

From a site that supports the official story of 9/11:

emphasis added

Also:

His point is the same as Red's, I think. That in high speed impacts the tail doesn't survive so this is not such an odd fact.

So, martin....you will see that even those on your side admit freely that the tail section was not, in fact, found. Why don't you admit this and move on to a better point.

link, if interested:http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html

 

Holy Cow!:lol:

 

channeling harry caray?:grin: