They really think we are that stupid

Originally posted by SabanFan:

Einstein? You can address me as flabengal or sir....I think I've earned it! (Name that movie...)

Anyway, ............if the tail of a 757 always survives the impact and is found in the wreckage and you find a scene where there is no tail section then logic compels you to conclude......

That whatever the wreckage is, it's not of a 757.

So now that we are having fun and insulting one another.....why don't we skip the rest of the build up.........that should settle the question, eh?

what a discussion, man.....

 

so, photographic evidence CLEARLY indicates that a commercial airliner flew into the pentagon?

did the military superglue these parts to the missile before they fired it at their own employees?



P.S. i have seen millions (ok, prolly only thousands, but who's counting?) of photos of the world trade center damage.
I've yet to see a single photo showing the tail of a plane, even though the tail always survives the crash.
Wonder if maybe them was missiles too.

 

There have only been a handful of 757 accidents. Hardly enough to statistically measure if a tail section or any other components normally survives a crash. However, a 757 has never had an accident impacting a stationary object at the speeds of the 9-11 flights. Both crash sites had numerous missing and disintegrated pieces. Further, the 757 is an absolute rocket ship. Its aerodynamics allow for very quick acceleration. The impact speed of those planes would disintegrate almost everything after a crash.

 

:dis:

So yo're saying, flabengal, that you've seen EVERY 757 crash site?

 

Ok I am only going to say this once, so please pay attention.

Any offers of fighting and kicking one another's ass is crossing the lines of debate. I do not care if it is serious or in jest. That will not be tolerated.

Scream, curse, mock, get snarky, I dont care. But crossing the line of name calling by both sides, or threatening physical violence has no place in the discussion.

 

OkieTiger_KATT:

.

I was obviously making fun of that kind of talk. I completely agree with what you are saying and have no interest in debating in that style.

How about a comment or two regarding insults? Liar, kook, whacko or whatever......it just degrades the commentary of both sides after a while.

But glad to see there are some boundaries here.

Bravo! Bravo!

 

Barbara Boxer

 

That logic only works if you refuse to believe in the laws of physics. Knowing your stance on evolution, I can see how you can draw this (erroneous) conclusion.

You are correct. It's a 767.

 

You guys really enjoy futility. :lol: