LOL No, it was never out of date. In fact, he affirmed Article 5 this very morning. A "standard" within an organization that might need to be upheld or enforced doesn't mean the organization is obsolete. Under your apologist nonsense we could apply the term "obsolete" to just about ANYTHING. It's very amusing, though, how desperate you Trumplodytes become to twist words..... in this case, to try to change his meaning from the entire organization should be scrapped, at least as far as American participation is concerned, and as has been the conservative rallying cry for years now (you think I've forgotten that whole "we should not have the United Nations making laws for us!" nonsense?) into oh, no, all he meant was that some countries should pay more! You're all a bunch of intellectual pussies. AS IF when he declared during the campaign that "NATO is obsolete" he wasn't playing to his ignorant Republican anti-"world order" base. And now that reality has smacked him in the face people like you still can't admit that he was and remains nothing more than a know-nothing blowhard.
That's the first smart thing you've written in a while. And I already have an IT consultant. My granddaughter.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/north-korea-icbm-missile-explainer_us_595d1a63e4b02734df3591e0 Ok, how long would you say, before they could bomb Alaska?
