The Real threat to Democracy - We are screwed

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by APPTiger, Feb 14, 2022.

  1. APPTiger

    APPTiger still unable to post Geaux Tigers!

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    2,386
    Likes Received:
    2,813
    The Durham Probe has evidence and concluded that the Clinton Campaign hacked servers in Trump tower prior to the election in an effort to plant false evidence to tie Trump to Russia. The theory was to raise a flag to distract from Hillary Clintons email trouble and the FACT she and her staff destroyed subpoenaed and classified material.
    Then they continued their efforts and hacked official White House servers to continue this effort in order to discredit and impeach Trump. A current sitting and duly elected President of the United States of America.
    I have questions:
    1. Is this the threat to democracy the Democrats talk about everyday?
    2. Is this the insurrection the Democrats talk about everyday?
    3. Is it insurrection, sedition, a coup attempt or treason?
    4. How did the Clinton campaign get access to the servers in the first place?
    5. Who in government had to sign off on the contractors/people performing the work?
    6. Who in government knew, what did they know and when did they know it?
    7. Why isn't mainstream media covering this at all? Fox and other right leaning news sources is the only coverage.
    8. Is the January 6th committee just to distract from this?
    9. Will anyone besides useful sheep ever/actually be held to account or spend time in jail over this?
    10. Are the government agencies FBI/DOJ/CIA involved in this ignorant dupes of the Clinton campaign or willing and knowing accomplices?
    11. James Comey's Daughter is the Federal Prosecutor in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Why didn't she subpoena and reveal the client list ?
    Most of you know, I'm no Trump lover. But he was right (again) and truly never had a chance to properly govern. Will 60 minutes and other media issue correction or apologize? I feel like everyone in Washington that was against Trump has something to hide or is afraid Trump or another outsider will blow the roof off the corruption. The Democrats have and continue to prove they have no limits. They also are verifying the old joke that if they claim someone else is doing or trying to do something, they already have.
    The more I learn the more I understand we are well and truly screwed.
     
    LSUpride123, shane0911 and Frogleg like this.
  2. Frogleg

    Frogleg Registered Best

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,267
    Likes Received:
    1,972
    It's not really just Democrats...it's the Swamp, a cess pool of filth. Many Republican swamp monsters as well wanted the outsider gone. Now we have Swamp Caca Monster crapping in the Potus master bedroom sheets.

    Vote for outsiders.
     
    APPTiger and shane0911 like this.
  3. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Hacked servers? No, the Durham filing doesn't say that. To plant false evidence? No, it doesn't say that, either. It says a tech company gave a Clinton lawyer DNS information; that lawyer's aim was to gather derogatory information on trump. Durham doesn't say anything about "planting false evidence", so you're either lying on your own or have believed the lies of right wing hack sites like Fox.

    Whose theory is that? Yours? It's certainly not contained in the Durham filing, even though Durham is nothing more than a MAGAt appointed by a corrupt Attorney General for the purpose of clearing donald trump.

    Durham doesn't even allege that the Clinton campaign eavesdropped on communications. As far as I can tell a technical guy shared DNS ping information with the Clinton campaign, nothing more. The sort of stuff Mike Lindell and Sidney Powell love to blast at their press conferences. No content spied on or intercepted, no messages eavesdropped. How can we know this? Precisely because Durham the MAGAt would have included that information in his filing. The source and destination pings looked suspicious to cyber security experts so they turned that over to the CIA, as should any decent American.

    And Durham's filing managed to implicitly confirm that there was a LOT of DNS activity between the trump campaign and Russian DNS addresses.

    About that technical guy who is the supposed source of this DNA information? Per his spokesperson, "Joffee is an apolitical internet security expert with decades of service to the U.S. Government who has never worked for a political party, and who legally provided access to DNS data obtained from a private client that separately was providing DNS services to the Executive Office of the President (EOP)."

    This is a big nothingburger. Painted falsely now by trumpians and other wingnuts to distract from his avalanching mountain of trouble. No accusation by Dunham that anybody did anything illegal. No indictments, even though he wishes he could. NOTHINGBURGER.

    No accusation of illegal activity by somebody itching to find some. That's really all you need to know.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2022
  4. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Moot and invalid questions, inasmuch as you totally mischaracterized the Durham filing. Watch less Fox, you'll be smarter for it.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2022
  5. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    That's on him. He's too stupid and too corrupt to ever properly govern.
    Corrections and apologies by media outlets typically follow errors, so no, of course not.
    Something to hide like that bullshit in your opening post here? If trump could have exposed any actual wrongdoing he would have done so, instead we saw a steady stream of crooks and robbers employed by his campaign and then administration (Flynn, Manafort, etc.). trump's about to get his OWN head blown off.
    The Democrats want to hold a crooked piece of shit traitor accountable for his crimes. Oh, the shame!
    Such as? Be specific. You mean like cheating on his financial statements in order to obtain fraudulent loans and cheat on his taxes? No, that would be trump, now wouldn't it?
     
  6. APPTiger

    APPTiger still unable to post Geaux Tigers!

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    2,386
    Likes Received:
    2,813
    Oh yeah, Repugs that are/were never Trump. "Drain the swamp" indeed. Possible some just didn't like him but gotta think the majority didn't want the corruption exposed. Many people should be in jail. We need term limits and limits on the power of career civil servants. This is beyond scary. Either huge chunks of our government are completely inept or they are complicit.
     
    Frogleg and shane0911 like this.
  7. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,674
    Likes Received:
    23,881
    There is a lot of both. I'm in favor of dumping ALL of them, the entire lot and starting from scratch.
     
    fanatic likes this.
  8. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Nice thought Shane and in many ways I agree. However be careful of what you ask.Ask the members of the Gironde how it turned out in 1789 France. Ask Kerensky how it turned out in 1917 Russia.
    The only time in history a revolution was successful in making changes without falling down a rabbit hole of violence and chaos was here in 1776. We were blessed to have the greatest generation of leaders ever to guide us. Do you see anyone like them around today?
     
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,674
    Likes Received:
    23,881
    Me mf'r
     
    APPTiger, LSUpride123 and Winston1 like this.
  10. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    It's never trump who's the corrupt one with you trumpians, is it? How many crooks associated with him, how many tax firms that disavow him, how many former appointees that now condemn him, how many lawsuits for grifting people, how many investigations for malfeasance, how many investigations for loan and tax fraud, how many investigations for election tampering, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseum does it take for you to open your eyes? I might could understand if you, personally, benefited from his immense corruption, but you don't. He's a narcissist which means he despises you, you exist only to serve him, he thinks you're a peon. Do you need to be hit on the side of the head?
     
    56lsu likes this.

Share This Page