No, I am logical and I have reasons which I state. You just mock and jeer and offer no substance to back it up.
Re-read my post. I did address the main one. Your biggest point is that the sanctions will snap back when the iranians cheat. all you have is your belief in the people who signed this worthless piece of paper to go on. I can look at the countless times these agreements have been pissed on by the same people who signed them, to know it's a sham.
Of course it's a sham, and you need only go back to bsrachmed a few years ago stroking the Iranians and telling them openly that he would side with them. Pathetic
Then you just essentially don't believe in treaties or agreements and have already decided that this is a worthless piece of paper because of your politics. Which are the "countless times" that agreements of this type have been broken? You said that sanctions will never happen again. The fact is that the agreement has snapback provisions that automatically happen if Iran breaks the deal. All the major powers have signed on. No one gets the right to veto it. If you want to be skeptical, fine. But it does not change the facts.
This is perfect . . . Al Qaeda declares war on ISIS. So our enemies Hezbollah, Syria, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Iraq, and Iran are all fighting each other. And some people think we need to stop it! http://news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-lead...-war-isis-151231254--abc-news-topstories.html
Red as you know I realize this treaty is the best we can get AT THIS TIME. However don't fool yourself or try to fool us that the SnapBack provisions have any substance. The reason is that all the powers were too ready to abandon the sanctions and only see the short term advantage. Only the most egregious violation will have a chance of bringing them back. Do you really think the sanctions will go back in place unless the powers WANT them? There is no mutually agreed trip wire and even if there were it will take a positive action by all to make them happen again. SnapBack is a fig leaf at best.