Republicans The GOP's Presidential Candidates

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LaSalleAve, Jan 28, 2015.

  1. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    Yes, that's true and of course it's grossly unfair. But say a CEO for a company with 10,000 employees is making $100 Million a year. Then his pay is cut to $50 Million. Does that mean the 10,000 employees will get a raise averaging $5,000 a year? Hell no! They might get a pittance and the extra $50 Million will just be rolled into profits.

    I just don't see income inequality as an issue. There have always been rich people, middle class people and poor people. Taking money from the rich without a corresponding redistribution to the middle class and poor is just saying, "Hey, we don't like you making so much more than us! We can't make any more so we'll bring you down."
     
  2. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    Here is the thing. The shareholders that matter are the ones that agree to pay the CEO's this much.

    I know the common stock holder is a shareholder, but not in the way that really matters.

    Its the guys at the top that are considered.
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,644
    Here is the thing. The poor and the middle class far out weigh the rich. The rich would be stupid to push this trend further IMO or they will wind up with a voted system of just "taking" their money.
     
  4. HalloweenRun

    HalloweenRun Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    7,481
    Likes Received:
    4,967
    Here is the problem. The rich use poor whites as surrogates, and manipulate the poor to battle on such issues as race, religion, and abortion. That way, keeping these surrogates from focusing on economic issues, which should be the great unifying issue, they are able to stay in power, though their numbers are small.

    It is beyond sinister, evil, you name it.
     
    red55 likes this.
  5. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    You just don't get it at all.
     
  6. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    I get the fact that there have always been a few people with way more money than the rest of us. In today's dollars the robber barons were even farther ahead of everybody than today's billionaires are. If we tax the superrich at 95% the money won't go in my pocket or yours. Income inequality sounds like a political buzzword to make the masses think they will somehow benefit by tearing down the rich instead of doing something to better themselves.
     
  7. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,754
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    Red just loathes rich people
     
  8. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Like I say you just don't get it. No one is talking about income redistribution, but a more equitable way for corporate profits to be handled.

    Did you sing the little "nyah, nyah," song, you sad little schoolyard cheerleader? You get it even less.
     
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,754
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    And stuck my tongue out at you while I did it
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  10. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    So now we hear the truth. You don't care about higer pay for the working people. You're just mad because your dividend checks aren't bigger.
     

Share This Page