The new court’s absurd inhumanity: To preserve procedure, an innocent man must die https://www.yahoo.com/news/court-absurd-inhumanity-preserve-procedure-100000629.html
even though you are a boring fuckwad, i read your article "That is a decision released last month, Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, which is likely to result in the execution of an innocent man" there is not a doubt this guy killed a woman and a child. the argument being made is that is he retarded. he is a killer. he is guilty. the issue is about court procedure intervening to save murdering retards from the chair. keep in mind this guy in question is not innocent, he is a killer. he stabbed a mother 15 times, some in the eye, and her daughter, he sexually assaulted her and then stabbed her repeatedly until dead. so you keep defending him.
well thanks for your very informative and intricate input on an article nobody read but me, probably not even you.
so you finally read it then. good. nobody gives a shit. its not a political issue its federal vs state authority procedural nonsense that you are trying to use to say conservatives are mean. you want to claim your politcal opponents are not just wrong, but evil, its a childish impulse.
Just wanted to bump this thread for it's hypocrisy, considering @Rex and his ilk are all for killing babies. So who's really the ghoulish party of death? Anyone who is ok with aborting this.
That's not a baby, that's a fetus. And a female who's been raped should not be forced to have her life impacted by a non-person. Aside from all that, most abortions occur LONG before that stage of development. You're as dishonest as ever.