people are far less vulnerable to climate than they used to be. we have air conditioning and better construction and more robust infrastructure. you really dont need stats to be able to understand this. also, one of the claims made is that climate change will destroy crops and make us starve? do we look like we are starving? show me a place where you think people are malnourished and i will show a place at war or involved in some sort of political malfeasance, not a victim of climate change. the far greater risk is obesity related disease, even now in poorer countries. we suffer from abundance, not scarcity. the net temperature rise actually net saves people from cold death, which is far more of a threat than heat death.
You should see some of the climate nut claims from the 60's and 70's. Floods in New York, like Noahs ark type shit and lots of other foolishness. This entire climate babble is just that, a bunch of nuts trying to steal money by scaring people half to death with nonsense. @Kikicaca This is your calling baw, do your thang
trump says global warming is a chinese plot, and thats not exactly true, but there is some truth to it. the chinese want to manufacture everything, and they want to do with it with cheap fossil fuel energy while the rest of the world moves to more expensive energy and ruin their own production capacity with high prices. for every coal plant that closes in the west, two open in china and emit carbon like crazy. they cannot be stopped. there is nothing that can be done to reduce global emissions. and after china, as africa industrializes they will emit carbon like crazy, and they should as they are very poor and need energy to modernize, as we have done before them. we are so rich and adaptive we can handle the climate future. even if the worst predictions happen. wealth and human ingenuity wins. even if the water rises and new york falls in the ocean, so what? move to philadelphia. its just money.
If Rex was around when they wanted to burn Galileo and Curpernicus at the stake because they denied the "consensus" that the sun revolved around the earth he would have volunteered to light the fire. I have asked Rex and other who swallow the man made climate change lie a couple of rudimentary questions over the years. None have answered. I will do my best.
LOL. That's funny talk considering I'm an atheist... i.e. I never have and never will automatically follow what's popular. I go where evidence takes me.
facebook is banning climate denial. i belive 97% of scientists are claimed to believe in climate change? so they are banning 3%, thousands and thousands of scientists speaking of scientific consensus, i was told my whole life an asprin a day is good for your heart. today that was reversed.
I was interested in what was the difference between climate change and global warming so I used Google. Interesting article. https://www.climate.gov/news-featur...nce-between-global-warming-and-climate-change
Here is a nasty little fact about the so called 97%. The 97% is derived from about 200 hand picked people the left and the U.N. chose. Some were scientists but many not. The 97% is 97% of 200 scientists not 97% of scientist. This whole vile shit show fradulent movement is a lie. Please read opposing science now before those views are banned. Go to The Climate Depot on the internet, read Gregory Wrightstone and many others. We are not capable of changing the climate or even the weather, CO2 is good not bad, don't trust Google or Wikipedia for facts about earths climate and DEMOCRATS SUCK!
