I listened, and paused every section. Not a single person in the group was packing on Jan 6th. Further, none of them committed a crime other than to possess an "unregistered" hand gun. Registration .. the beginning of ending the 2nd Amendment. The Beeler fellow was case ... ok, he had a 9mm and bunch of ammo. He also had some 12 ga shotgun shells, with no shotgun. So obviously, he wasn't intending on shooting anybody with those. The new Federal Democrat tactic, ... arrest people for possessing a gun, label them a felon, and then take away their right to own guns.
Then why don't you use a search engine to search the topic? You won't because you won't be able to stand the responses you will get.
Here is a flash of brilliance. Weapons are not restricted to firearms. Having to make this observation is quite illuminating. If one chooses to limit weapons to only firearms, that clearly shows how one’s personal shortcomings affects one’s view of reality. If someone takes a flagpole, fire extinguisher, bear spray or shield and uses it to attack another, those objects become weapons. Just because one chooses not to call them such, only illustrates that one is choosing to not call them such. Even Albert Einstein knew this. When asked about the use of weapons in war, he allegedly replied, something like, he wasn’t sure what weapons would be used in WWIII, but the weapons used in WWIV would be stones and spears! Didn’t mention firearms! I’m done wasting time quibbling with people on the election, the insurrection, and Trump’s antics to date. That’s all piss under the bridge. There will never be agreement, but there is reality. Craft your eloquent and biting replies as you must, but please realize you are writing them for yourself or your compatriots. Not to me. I’ll see you again on a thread of interest going forward.