Techno Field Goals

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by LSUTiga, Nov 19, 2011.

  1. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,750
    Likes Received:
    11,275
    With technology, why haven't we come up with lasers beaming from some apparatus to register if field goals are good or not?

    Maybe even a cutting edge techno field for spotting the ball and first downs as well but that's a bit down the road. The FG lazer would seem a lot easier to rig up.
     
  2. ok awesome

    ok awesome geaux

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,001
    Likes Received:
    134
    The laser spotting technology already exists, actually.
     
  3. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,750
    Likes Received:
    11,275
    The yellow line?
     
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Better to put a sensor in the football itself and a grid of wires under the turf. Then we would know accurately if a first down was made, where forward progress was, or if the plane of the goal is broken . . . as well as if field goals were good.
     
  5. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,750
    Likes Received:
    11,275
    Why didn't I think of THAT!?! Seriously, that is probably a lot cheaper and more feasible. Some sort of GPS balls.

    Will have to be made to withstand the shock of Wing's foot though.

    I have to admit I have some reservations about the technology aspect. It takes the human element out of the game but college football is SUCH big bucks now it's sad to lose on a blown call. I felt the same way about replay, initially, but have come to embrace it- though sometimes nervously since it's not always fail-proof.

    I guess the next thing would be a baseball/strike zone.
     
  6. Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Go easy on me

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,353
    Likes Received:
    231
    Lets create robot players too
     
  7. FirstCoastTiger

    FirstCoastTiger FirstCoastTiger

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    167
    Cool idea.

    Say goodbye to real grass forever, though.

    That actually would be fine with me because LSU usually runs 40 mph faster on artificial turf stadiums in Domes.
     
  8. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,750
    Likes Received:
    11,275
    Maybe the Penn St. coaches wouldn't buttphuck THEM.
     
  9. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    I should have patented it before speaking . . .

    All it would do would be to replace the chain gang with a sideline official with an iPad showing him exactly where the ball went.
     
  10. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,997
    Likes Received:
    17,169
    They experimented with this back in the 70s. An "electronic umpire" that could detect if the ball came over the plate within the strike zone. But it also got set off if the batter tapped the plate with his bat, or if the catcher accidentally stuck his glove over the plate, and the occasional half-swing. They solved it by inserting a metal chip in the ball, which was the only thing that would influence the machine. Two problems with it, though. The ball cost about 25 dollars (normal balls were about 4 dollars at the time), and the ball would "break" if it took any kind of shock, like say, being hit with a bat.
     

Share This Page