Teams With Running Quarterbacks

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by Hawker45, Nov 30, 2007.

  1. Hawker45

    Hawker45 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,779
    Likes Received:
    440
    .... thought I'd "donate" this from our forum. It's based on a discussion of whether the Hawkeyes should get with the national trend of option football and quarterbacks who can run. On that premise, the numbers below can be a surprise... as only five teams in the top 25 have QB's with more than 100 carries.
    VaTech and USC did not have QB's that started at least 75% of their games, so their numbers are void (according to NCAA.org).


    BCS TOP 25

    Team…………QB rushes….net yards
    Missouri………….93…………258
    West Virginia……163……….1144
    Ohio State…………47…………70
    Georgia…………….37……….- 18
    Kansas……………..82………..203
    V Tech…………….did not Q…….
    LSU………………..88………..207
    USC………………..did not Q……
    Oklahoma…………24…………..8
    Florida…………….194……….838
    BC…………………53…………-9
    Hawaii……………..65…………74
    Arizona State………82……….-158
    Tennessee………….15………..-23
    Illinois……………..150………774
    Clemson……………63………..-86
    Oregon…………….105……….583
    Wisconsin…………103……….259
    BYU………………..45…………19
    Texas……………….98……….408

    Doesn't look like Ainge will be a risk to run tomorrow!
     
  2. LSUtiger327

    LSUtiger327 Pow right in da kissa

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,132
    Likes Received:
    688
    yeah, but i also think there's a difference btwn a running qb and a mobile qb. i would see guys like flynn as mobile and able to be used in the spread while tebow, white, juice, and dixon may be considered more runners that being mobile.

    i guess my point is while there may not be a trend for more runners, mobility definitely is on the rise as a need for qb's.
     
  3. lsu-i-like

    lsu-i-like Playoff advocate

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    17,958
    Likes Received:
    8,799
    The spread is pretty popular now and teams are having trouble defending it, so I'd seriously consider at least parts of it. Having a running qb really is tough on a defense if he can throw as well. I prefer mobile qbs.
     

Share This Page