Specifically, What do you like or dislike about Trump?

i dont need to discern the intent, its told explictly to me by the writers of the document.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...tics-are-wrong-about-history-intent-230.shtml

"
Author Of Section 230 Chris Cox Says All The Critics Are Wrong About The History And Intent Of 230"


it had two writers.

here is the other

"
Ron Wyden Explains Why President Trump (And Many Others) Are Totally Wrong About Section 230

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...ers-are-totally-wrong-about-section-230.shtml

 

so again, its not so much my opinion, but the explicit and exact opinion of the folks that wrote the law itself

 

if trump doesnt like twitter, he can use an alternative. he shouldnt try to use the power of government to fuck with twitter. he should use gab or parler of any of a bunch of alternatives

 

so ignore what the framers meant in favor of some future judge? thats not how laws work. we dont invent possible futures for them and adjudicate based on that

we already know what it means. we dont need to pretend we are clueless until some future judge gets involved. laws can exist even before the future you imagine.

what exacty do we want here? should trump be able to coerce twitter to run their company the way he wants?

and we want that freedom for biden too if he is elected?

 

“If you like your doctor you can keep him”

 

I couldn't. He retired. Now I'm lucky if my new doctor spends 2 minutes with me. That's long enough for a hooker but not for proper medical care.

 

you guys are not big on making rational and clearly stated counterpoints

 

you used to be better at this

I guess time stands still for no one....

 

that was when i was arguing with red, who had actual points to make

you said this:

"“If you like your doctor you can keep him”"

could you make that into a point about the topic? or do you want me to make your points for you based on your vague paraphrases of obama about a different topic?