Don't think so because their rankings had KW included in them because even though he had not signed, he was still listed as an "LSU commitment".
but if you look we have a better star rating than 5 and 6 and as many or more signees, so how does that not add up to a higher ranking?
Good question but if you've watched rivals for a few years you know they dont rank based on average stars. Doesnt matter anyway. The only thing that matters is how good our coaches have evaluated the talent and how it fits in with our needs. Based on that it looks like we hit a gold mine, especially once KW signed. He was needed badly considering our injuries.
