the talk has been that if Mizzou becomes the 14th member of the SEC that they want to move Auburn to the east. The problem with that is that Alabama's permanent opp from the east is Tenn so they would have to give up either playing Tenn or Auburn every year which they don't want to do. I know geographicly Auburn is east of Tuscaloosa but if you put Alabama in the east and make Auburn their permanent opp then that would work. Of course LSU wouldn't be playing Alabama every year which may also be a problem to some. Just an opinion.
How do you think they will handle the Alabama Tennessee and Alabama Auburn problem. Maybe have 2 permanent opps from the east ?
I agree but I heard this morning that Alabama was against Missouri coming into the SEC because of that reason. they would have to switch their permanant opp to be Auburn and lose the permanant Tenn game every year. I say send Alabama and Auburn to the east and send Vandy to the west. SEC west champs every year. LOL..
Poor auburn. We don't want them in the west. They don't want them in the east. Auburn is like that dude you know that doesn't bathe every day. He's a good worker but you don't want to have lunch with him. He does an ample job but he stinks too bad to be around. You don't mind him working but you don't want him talking to the client because, well, he's just an embarrassment. I wonder if the big whatever wants to make a swap?
Seems like it would be better to add someone to the East. and since Georgia Tech and Clemson and Florida State already have SEC teams in their states we could get Virginia Tech. I would rather them than Mizzo.
