SEC Officials: Green penalty a mistake, Scott penalty correct

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by red55, Oct 5, 2009.

  1. arizonafan

    arizonafan Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    33
    I think someone should tell them that rule 9-2 should be rolled up tightly and shoved up some 80 year old NCAA rules committee reprobate's rear end.
     
  2. sassylsufan2002

    sassylsufan2002 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    15
    Absolutely! They both did, Scott first tapped himself on the chest before he put his hands in the air....but so did Green! So, why come out now changing their minds about the call??? This is such BS!
     
  3. Fishhead

    Fishhead Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,887
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    The ball was NOT touched past the line of scrimmage until AFTER the interference. But it's a moot point. The interference happened first.
     
  4. Tigerbnd05

    Tigerbnd05 National Champs 2003 2007

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    69
    It was the correct no call. If you were listening to the announcers for CBS, they were totally full of crap, as usual, and not looking at the whole rule. It didn't matter if he was outside the tackle box or got it across the line of scrimmage because there was a receiver in the vicinity of the "throw."

    No intentional grounding and no safety.
     
  5. lsudolemite

    lsudolemite CodeJockey Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,588
    Likes Received:
    1,229
    The time you're referring to, yes, he was interfered with before the pass. I was referring to the wrap up in your photo.
     
  6. pharpe

    pharpe Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    328
    The interference was clearly before the "tip" that was about a foot in front of the receiver that was already being held. Can't argue with the pic it's all right there.
     
  7. lsudolemite

    lsudolemite CodeJockey Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,588
    Likes Received:
    1,229
    For some reason I was thinking there was illegal contact twice on that play.
     
  8. StaceyO

    StaceyO Football Turns Me On

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Messages:
    15,643
    Likes Received:
    8,487
    But who CARES if an athlete calls attention to himself? As someone said in another thread, it's a game, and it's supposed to be fun.

    Elite athletes all have a swagger about them; they're cocky. What's wrong with that, anyway?
     
  9. gumborue

    gumborue Throwin Ched

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,839
    Likes Received:
    577
    georgia fans are ticked that the head of officials is a GT grad. evidently this has been the case on other calls they didnt like.

    and did you hear that brando is talking about how race plays in to the celebration calls?
     
  10. bayareatiger

    bayareatiger If it's too loud YOU'RE TOO OLD

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2002
    Messages:
    5,448
    Likes Received:
    509
    FWIW I happen to agree with you.

    I was merely describing what I saw, and what possible motivation the referee would have to make those calls.

    ESPECIALLY because the rule is so nefarious and so subject to personal interpretation.
     

Share This Page