Nope, we have used China (and other countries) for the greater good of the US consumer. Again, smart business owners will find a way to be the MOST competitive. It is the way of the free market. My argument is well grounded.
Have you listened to that entire speech? If so, it is very apparent that when he said, "You didn't build that," he was talking about the infrastructure. Secondly, Obama is not anti-business. I have been in business for myself for years and he is no more anti-business than GWB, Slick Willy, GB or Reagan. This is a conservative talking point that gets kicked around but, in fact, it is simply untrue. I would like to hear your explanation for why you think he is anti-business and, further, would like to see some evidence. You may not listen to fox news but you definitely get your news from Conservative outlets because those are the only ones who are talking about "You didn't build that," as if he were completely disregarding the risk, investment and long hours of small business owners, which just isn't true.
But tax hikes are evil, right. I know exactly of the budget under Clinton, so go fuck yourself, about what you think I know. You fucking bitch. Now if you want to go this route we can. Your broad points dont mean shit, you mention nothing about the Bush tax cuts and the current annual deficit situation that we are now in that started in the last administration. But you talk about the Clinton budget when the tax rates were higher than now. like i said you are talking in circles now.
Well, I have never said he was anti business, but I think his tax justification is dishonest. His infrastructure bit is dishonest in my opinion and was his nice way of laying his outline to tax them more without real reform of the tax system. Not once have we been presented with facts as to how and why higher taxes will create more jobs...
you may not directly support this scandal, as I am sure no reasonable person would. However, conservatives are definitely against regulating banks or corporations and several independent studies have clearly shown that more regulation would have prevented our current crisis. The LIBOR scandal is further indication that these studies have been correct. That said, I do not believe that conservatives WANTED this kind of scandal. No sane person would. It should, however, give them pause about championing the cause of less regulations. In fairness, Slick Willy signed a lot of the deregulation into law so the blame goes both ways to a certain extent but the Republicans are the ones who seemed to have not learned their lesson.
Never said tax hikes are evil. I have always said tax reform is needed before you just raise taxes to some level in the past when the economy and Policy's were different. I mean, if you want to go back to Clinton, then I guess you support his brilliant housing idea. That shit turned out swell. What about the Bush tax cuts? The tax cuts were only a portion of the problem. BUSH DIDN'T CUT SPENDING. So if you want to talk about the facts, lets do that. You will see next to ZERO support for BUSH'S SPENDING habits.
Well, to be clear, I believe in fully understanding a problem before making a federal wide proclamation on policy. Regulation is a fine line that is not walked easily.
Like what? Tell us which businesses do not need roads and bridges? If not, then do their employees need them in order to get to work? This statement shows that you are truly the one who is out of touch. His statement is only dishonest and/or out of touch when you take it out of context. If taking statements out of context are the best thing that the Republicans can come up with against him then you guys are in for a long election season.
