Saints to Franchise Charles Grant

Discussion in 'OTHER SPORTS Forum' started by tirk, Feb 20, 2007.

  1. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    47,369
    Likes Received:
    21,536
    i like this move even though he was invisible in the nfccg.

    owed 8.66 mill but its a one-year deal only. he had over 20 sacks thru 2003-4.

    Source: Saints to tag DE Grant as franchise player
    By Len Pasquarelli
    ESPN.com


    Barring an unexpected breakthrough in contract negotiations, ESPN.com has learned that the New Orleans Saints will designate left defensive end Charles Grant as a franchise player before Thursday's deadline, a move that will keep him off the unrestricted free agent market.


    There has been virtually no momentum in contract discussions since the end of the season, and it will take considerable progress in the next few days to even close the gap in talks, much less reach an accord. Teams who want to exercise the franchise or transition marker on a player have until Thursday to do so.

    The value of the franchise marker for a defensive end, which basically represents a one-year qualifying offer, is $8.66 million.

    If the Saints use the franchise tag, Grant will be able to negotiate with other teams, and New Orleans will have a right of first refusal. But the cost for another club to sign a franchise player is exorbitant, with compensation set at a air of first-round draft choices, so franchise players rarely change teams.

    Grant had hoped to avoid the franchise tag because of the acrimony it typically entails and because, like most pending free agents, he would prefer to be unrestricted.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2771560&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. qball316

    qball316 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    68
    I think its a no brainer. We may take an 8.66 mil hit in the cap but think about the cap hit we would take bringing in someone similar. We would have to pay a salary in range of 5 mil a year plus the signing bonus. Besides all the DE that are any good have already been tagged.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. qball316

    qball316 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    68
    Today on my way home, evidently I just missed a Charles Grant interview on NFL Radio. They were talking about how he sounded very upset about being franchised. But they said he's a professional and would still show up on gameday. I wish I would have caught the interview, but I guess he thought he could get alot more on the open market.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. bhelmLSU

    bhelmLSU Founding Member Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    2,600
    This article explains his disappointment with the situation. Basically when you are tagged it means the team is not willing to pay for a long-tern commitment at this time.

    From NOLA.com:
    http://www.nola.com/sportsflash/sai...orts-12/1172022378210690.xml&storylist=saints
     
  5. qball316

    qball316 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    68
    I think its more of a matter of buying time. With the salary cap jumping so high the next few years because of the new CBA, image what kinda money it would take to sign Grant, not just his contract but the signing bonus also. This way they could hold on to him for another year for $8mil and start looking to develope a replacement. If nothing surfaces, they can do the same thing to him next year. Sounds like a dirty way to do things (tagging him year after year) but thats business, kinda like players holding out for bigger contracts.

    I still think it was the smart move. Looking forward to seeing Grant in the QBs face next season.
     
  6. TigerFan23

    TigerFan23 USMC Tiger

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    213
    I agree. It seems to me they knew they wouldn't be able to get a deal worked out prior to the Free Agency period beginning, so they did the safe thing by franchising him. Sure, no player wants that to happen, but he'll be singing a different tune once he inks a long term deal. It also helps that he's a fan favorite and loves the city of New Orleans. I don't see this staff working him over like the previous one did with Darren Howard.
     
  7. MFn G I M P

    MFn G I M P Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,977
    Likes Received:
    87
    Even if he is upset, he is still gonna be one of the highest paid DL in the league, which has to count for something.
     
  8. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    46,115
    Likes Received:
    9,705
    Well he has all the incentive in the world to put up big numbers, because if he has a year like 05 (2 1/2 sacks), the Saints wont franchise him and his value in the FA market will take a hit.
     
  9. Crip*TEAM KATT

    Crip*TEAM KATT As Wild As We Wanna Be

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Messages:
    9,850
    Likes Received:
    463
    What about him saying that "I gotta feed my family"

    Bobby had some very food smart callers with tips on how to feed a family on 8 Mil
     

Share This Page