Well, help me out here. If I paid for some sort of info that was only available to those who paid for it, I personally would never have a problem with sharing that info with others. I don't see how anyone could disagree with how I roll. You went to college at USC, right? USC is not free. Your USC college professors were paid to give you specific premium feedback in the subjects that you studied at USC, right? And you don't believe in sharing that specific premium info that you were taught at USC to others unless USC becomes free at some point? I could care less about how Shepard looked during a couple days at some QB camp, but I do find that disturbing that one would claim that he can't share something he knows with another because he paid money to learn it in the first place. Like I said, that's just not how I roll, and it's a pet peeve of mine to discover that others don't roll the way I roll when it comes to this issue. In other words, say someone asked you about something you learned in a class at USC (or if someone asked you about something you learned from an educational dvd you paid for and watched or about some book you bought and read), and you told them that you were sorry but you don't believe in sharing that kind of info for free. I'd think you were an absolute freak if you told me that.
Sorry you felt it was a waste of your time. I now feel the same way about providing any more recruiting info here. Funny, 510 thread views. Serious waste of time. Then can you tell me why some parts and features of this forum are for contributors only? If some forms of content or features are considered worthy of paying for, and everybody just blabbered what they heard, then the content is no longer valuable and nobody pays for a membership. It's the same thing as taking your video camera to a movie and then selling/giving your bootleg copy to other people. I don't care how you roll and if "stealing" information is a pet peave of yours. If you can't understand the basic concept of doing the right thing, I can't help you. wiki that.
I have no idea if USCvball is a male or a female. But I tend to believe he is a male graduate of USC.
Go talk to your own USC professors about this issue. Listen to what they say. USC is a good school, they will explain to you how off you are in regards to this issue (i'd explain more, but I'd have to make you pay for the premium content).
Ok, since this thread is completely hijacked anyway, I will weigh in... Number one, I think it was obvious that vball didn't realize that this was part of the premium site when she originally posted it. and said so in the thread. Also, I don't think that you can blame the girl for not posting the article from a paid for site to a free part on another site. If you blame her or want to ridicule her then shame on you. Thirdly, maybe if it wasn't off season and you boys didn't get so dang riled up at every little comment she may have summed it up for you, but hell I wouldn't now either. Forth, vball has proven her knowledge in recruiting even when it comes to LSu and I think was just trying to get a little LSU info that her site had. For all he know that was all the wearesc article said and that was the summary and she was just posting to say "hey look LSU fans, they were talking about your boy!" So for that thanks vball for the heads up and I really appreciate you sending me the summary via pm.:thumb:
I posted free material including the photograph of Shepard. The link I posted included other free material such as the interview with Matt Barkley, the interview with Snoop, other camp photos. The camp summary was available to subscribers only and I provided no detailed information on that. I appreciate that. I guess that's one reason I posted it because it is the off season and I enjoy anything to do with football at this point. Bingo.
