This one was too easy..... http://twitchy.com/2012/10/03/undec...rank-luntz-ive-never-seen-anything-like-this/
they were so so deep into policy that i dodunt even understand the specifics of the numbers they tossed around. i watched with my liberal friends in manhattan, even they conceded that romney. incidentally one of the wives of my friends is so liberal that she hates me without knowing me because i am the only conservative in the friend circle. all the rest of the wives adore me and want to set me up with their friends. but this one bitch literally is angry when she comes in and we are watching the debate and i mock my own pro-romney positions. people are way to wrapped up in this shit. i hate when people take shit personal and cant argue as friends.
bingo, to wrapped up is true, i have plenty of friends that are conservative, guys that I play golf with go to their homes etc. We talk about it, but it never becomes personal. Mitt won on aggressiveness, but he walked back many of his position on taxes, healthcare, education. Yes MA was 1 in education before and after him, but 47th in job creation.
Mitt won the night but I still do not understand how he is going to cut taxes, increase military spending, repeal Obamacare and replace it with his own system, reduce the deficit, increase jobs, work with Democrats, and turn the economy around. The next debate should get into details, not talking points.
If he can articulate the details of this plan I will consider voting for him. Otherwise I'm firmly entrenched in camp Johnson.
Mitt won this one on style and did what he had to do in order to survive. In doing so he apparently has adopted a new tax and economic growth plan. The underlying theme of this debate was that Romney had to tack hard to the center to keep his head above water. Further, he had to abandoned many things he has championed over the past 18 months. If the President had been on his game better he could have won this debate by more effectively calling Mitt out for the inconsistencies in his story.