The opposition to abortion has never been about saving the lives of children; it's always been about SELF. How can we know this? Because those anti-choicers are the very first to oppose programs that would protect the health and well-being of infants and children. Universal pre-K? Forget about it. Government-sponsored daycare, that their mothers might go out and earn a decent living for them? No way. Instead, as I've said, it's about SELF. It's about a religious notion that a fertlized egg has something they call a "soul", something that was meant by their celestial overlord to first pass an Earth-survival test to earn a place into eternal paradise. The anti-choicer wants to make sure his own opinion on the matter is registered with their god; it's part of the test. Aborting that would-be baby presents a dilemma: why shouldn't that aborted fetus have been made to go through the same test? Does the aborted zygote get a free pass to heaven that the anti-choicer didn't get? If so, why was this scripted plan even necessary in the first place? As for the baby that's actually born? Who gives a rat's ass? My own opposition to his/her abortion has been registered. My own support for the master plan, no matter how unnecessary it seems to be, has been recorded in god's book.
Rex you try to hide behind generalities yet ignore the little details that give lie to your position. This lists 9 items in the bill that allow a back door path to unlimited abortion throughout the pregnancy. Yes it’s be a conservative but you can’t escape the facts. This bill will allow for unlimited abortion up to birth. https://twitter.com/mccormackjohn/status/1522190541311692805?s=21&t=z9ZeCeWv_4zB5Uf1hEKFiw
You keep linking to lying rightwing hacks. Unfortunately for you I've actually read HR3755. It doesn't say what they want it to say. And Schumer's only plan is to codify the provisions of HR3755 and Roe into law. It does not change abortion rights into abortions without restrictions.
like i said many times, your goal here is never to discuss the issue, its to call people hypocrites. "the same people that X are the same hypocrites that Y" is how the left always deflects.
yeah the same guy (me) that criticizes the left, is strangely silent about the right. LOL HYPOCRiT you got em again
thats right, it explicitly not the issue. the right argues they dont want to kill babies. this seems like a rational viewpoint. no need to consider their motives. either they are right or wrong. is murdering babies ok? thats the issue. not whether the right favors funding pre-K or whatever. you apparently think its ok to murder babies. and you also claim you care about the rights of women, which is stupid because men have babies too, and also you apparently are willing to violate the rights of bodily autonomy of the women in certain circumstances. hey if you want to violate a womens right to her body thats something you will have to come to terms with, your own horrible sexism.
