BMY: that is the same exact number other are coming up with I am sure Rivals will fix it....after Bama gets the lime light
No way they fix it. They will find some excuse as to why the numbers are indeed correct and declare Bama #1. They are also going to skip the drama and go ahead and name Bama #1 next year too.
LOL For some reason I am not surprised. They will keep it if it is indeed incorrect and possibly change it after everyone forgets about the rankings.
Izzy are you going to do a breakdown of the rankings??? The project is right up your alley.:thumb: Hope you had fun today, sleep it off.
Guess what, it increased the interest in there site. That what drives there mis-count of Bama's points. Now LSU ranked #1 isn't a Big Story. But Satan coming from far behind to capture the Paper National Championship is a Big Story. BS way to just give Bama 40 points without accounting for it. Rivals.com lost my respect.
well they explained it wrong, and frankly the way he was doing it should be the way its done. top 20 players count towards the H value while all players count toward the N. only counted the top 20 for N as well. this gives teams who sign more players extra points. which can be off set by lower star average in some cases but considering the 4 guys that are questionable to bama are all 4*'s they get a bump from it.
