Rickey & Rice Elected to HOF

Discussion in 'OTHER SPORTS Forum' started by COTiger, Jan 12, 2009.

  1. Nutriaitch

    Nutriaitch Fear the Buoy

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    11,508
    Likes Received:
    2,772
    OK

    OBP
    Raines .385
    Rice .352

    Runs Scored
    Raines 1571 (102 per 162 avg)
    Rice 1249 (97 per 162 games)

    Steals
    Raines 808
    Rice 58 (told ya Rice didn't steal)

    Doubles
    Rice 29 per 162
    Raines 28 per 162

    Triples
    Raines 7 per 162
    Rice 6 per 162

    SLG%
    Rice .502
    Raines .425

    Total Bases
    Rice 320 per 162
    Raines 244 per 162

    All Star appearances
    Rice 8 in 16 years
    Raines 7 in 23 years


    if these are my 2 choices for left field, give me Rice all day long.
    no hesitations


    that's 11 categories, and Rice is better in 7 of the 11
     
  2. DRC

    DRC TigerNator

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    374
    Hardly much of a distinction when many of those categories Rice leads in are marginal at best. Raines total body of work is comparable to Rice but yet Rice gets 75% and Raines gets 22%? Does not compute.
     
  3. Nutriaitch

    Nutriaitch Fear the Buoy

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    11,508
    Likes Received:
    2,772
    Rice more than doubles Raines in the power categories, won an MVP, finisehed top 5 in MVP voting 5 other times.

    In 16 seasons, Rice finished top 10 in HRs 7 times (led league 3), RBI 9 times , BA 6 times, and Runs 6 times, Slg % 8 times.
    Dude was one of the absolute best of his era.

    Raines on the other hand only finished top 10 in BA 4 times in 23 seasons, and runs 8 times, and Slg % 1 time.
    Quality ballplayer? definitely
    great base stealer? hell yeah
    one of best of era? IMO, not quite
     
  4. DRC

    DRC TigerNator

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    4,745
    Likes Received:
    374
    Im not saying Rice doesnt deserve to be in and Raines does. Im old enough to remember both in their prime and both were great players. Raines had a much longer career and was a significant contributor even in his twilight.

    I just dont see the reason for the huge voting difference.
     
  5. Nutriaitch

    Nutriaitch Fear the Buoy

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    11,508
    Likes Received:
    2,772
    I'm not old enough to have seen or remembered the prime of Rice's career, so I can only go off his stats, and listening to other ballplayers from his era talk about him.

    Raines on the other hand, I saw a sh!tload of his career.
    And I don't ever remember thinking of him as being the best player on his own team, let alone in the league.
    Andre Dawson was easily a better player in Montreal.
    Robin Ventura was a solid player in early 90s and Big Hurt took over in early-mid 90's for the White Sox.
    Half the Yankees roster was better than him late in his career.
     

Share This Page