You didn't read the threat. I love these stat guys. If you went by stats Jacob Hester would have been playing community college ball. Slow white guy.
No. If you went by MEASURABLES...which is EXACTLY what you're doing with TT. Hester had very good stats here...and I don't know of one single Tiger fan that doesn't offer him the utmost respect. - Stats are proof of on the field productivity...and should be used as THE measuring stick. You don't like them because they don't favor your lame arguments. Just like how you don't like Charles Scott...you single out 3 or 4 bad plays and claim his style won't work against SEC competition...but you won't throw any of his big runs out there against SEC competition for comparison.
OMG I just had flashbacks of 10-11 YPC at the end of the Auburn game last year. Man was a beast. N/M...carry on. opcorn:
No, no. We aren't allowed to bring positive statistics into the conversation unless they relate to TT. There aren't any for TT yet...so leave stats out of this. We shouldn't be trying to cloud the issue with facts.
If you went by stats he would have never been a Tiger in the first place. The only reason he was a Tiger was because Saban happened to see him when he went to go look at Booty. You can't get on the field with stats. I love stat idiots.
You fail repeatedly. Hester had good stats in high school. It was simply measurables that he didn't have. WM made Cedric Benson look like a seventh grader running the ball...and the same year, Hester looked like Walter Payton against them.
So what? The stats were he was a slow chunky white guy. Sorry, the only reason he was a Tiger is Saban caught a glimpse of him when he was scouting Booty. You guys and your stats.
How do stats tell you what I guy looks like? Seeing 1000 yards rushing on paper doesn't tell me speed, size, or race. Not that I disagree with your assessment as to how Hester got his schollie, but I don't get how you surmise his look from stats...