The way I understand it, and how it was explained, as long as the institutions aren't paying (or boosters, etc) NCAA rules dont apply. It made sense when I first heard it and its basically what Bryce Brown is doing. Think about it, how can the NCAA prohibit families or advisers from accepting compensation for giving information? As long as they arent linked to an institution the NCAA has no control.
I would say they would be in favor of it. More recruiting, more money, more exposure, double the drama.
There is no question Browns mentor is a sleazy character but as I said before, what he's doing is not illegal at all. This stuff paves the way for someone like ESPN to step in and 'rescue' high school kids from these brokers. They are going to sell it as a win-win situation and when you read this about Brown its not going to be a hard sell.
If it is illegal to entice college players with houses, cars, etc for their families (see Bush, R for details), why wouldn't it be illegal for recruits as well? If it's not illegal for ESPN to pay the parents, why should it be illegal for boosters, alums, etc. to pay the kid's family directly? Same thing to me. Any thoughts? It would get UGLY really fast if big business REALLY, OPENLY starts marketing the recuiting scene. That's what I think, anyway. :geaux: